Literature DB >> 9214742

Selection on the protein-coding genes of the TBE1 family of transposable elements in the ciliates Oxytricha fallax and O. trifallax.

D J Witherspoon1, T G Doak, K R Williams, A Seegmiller, J Seger, G Herrick.   

Abstract

TBE1s are "cut-and-paste" transposable elements found in high copy number in the germline genomes of the ciliates Oxytricha fallax and O. trifallax. TBE1 "family" sequence (sequence of mixed polymerase chain reaction products generated using primers that match roughly half the TBE1s in host whole-cell DNA) was obtained from both host species. Although family sequence autoradiograms represent thousands of different elements, they are as legible as those representing corresponding sequences of a single TBE1, implying that ideal polymorphisms are rare within the genes examined. Nucleotide polymorphisms among TBE1s (indicated by ambiguities in family sequence) are far more common at third than at first or second positions of codons of genes, implying that selection has conserved the amino acid sequences of these genes in the majority of TBE1s. Portions of the transposase gene and another TBE1 gene have been sequenced from 10 individual TBE1s. None of these portions is interrupted by stop codons or frameshifts, and, for both genes, pairwise comparisons of these sequences show that nonsynonymous differences are significantly less common than synonymous differences, again implicating conservative selection Phylogenetic analysis shows that multiple divergent lineages of TBE1s have evolved under this selection within O. fallax. All these results are unexpected for cut-and-paste transposons in eukaryotic hosts: since transposase encoded by intact elements presumably acts in trans, it can duplicate mutant copies (those that do not encode functional transposase) found in the same genome, and thus no selection is expected to maintain the transposase gene. The selection demonstrated here could act at transposition (if functional TBE1s are preferentially transposed) or at the level of the host (if the host's fitness depends on functional TBE1 genes). TBE1-encoded proteins might be responsible for the precise excision of TBE1s that occurs during development of the host somatic nucleus; selection on hosts for uninterrupted somatic genes would then translate into selection for TBE1 protein-coding competence. We suggest a method for distinguishing between these two classes of explanations by finding and analyzing divergent alleles of ancestral transposable element insertions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9214742     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  21 in total

1.  Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa.

Authors:  I Arkhipova; M Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A family of developmentally excised DNA elements in Tetrahymena is under selective pressure to maintain an open reading frame encoding an integrase-like protein.

Authors:  J A Gershan; K M Karrer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Codon bias, tRNA pools and horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Tamir Tuller
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-05

4.  Diverse DNA transposons in rotifers of the class Bdelloidea.

Authors:  Irina R Arkhipova; Matthew Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Transposable Element Domestication As an Adaptation to Evolutionary Conflicts.

Authors:  Diwash Jangam; Cédric Feschotte; Esther Betrán
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Programmed Genome Rearrangements in the Ciliate Oxytricha.

Authors:  V Talya Yerlici; Laura F Landweber
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-12

7.  A c-Myc regulatory subnetwork from human transposable element sequences.

Authors:  Jianrong Wang; Nathan J Bowen; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; I King Jordan
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-07-21

8.  The architecture of a scrambled genome reveals massive levels of genomic rearrangement during development.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; John R Bracht; Aaron David Goldman; Egor Dolzhenko; Derek M Clay; Estienne C Swart; David H Perlman; Thomas G Doak; Andrew Stuart; Chris T Amemiya; Robert P Sebra; Laura F Landweber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A functional role for transposases in a large eukaryotic genome.

Authors:  Mariusz Nowacki; Brian P Higgins; Genevieve M Maquilan; Estienne C Swart; Thomas G Doak; Laura F Landweber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Transposons that clean up after themselves.

Authors:  Douglas L Chalker
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.