Literature DB >> 9212551

Mothers' beliefs about the causes of infant growth deficiency: is there attributional bias?

L A Sturm1, D Drotar, K Laing, G D Zimet.   

Abstract

Tested for defensive attributional bias in mothers' causal explanations for infant (2-12.5 months) growth deficiency. Mothers of healthy babies (controls; n = 82), growth deficient babies without medical problems (n = 27) and growth deficient babies with mild medical problems (n = 22) rated their levels of agreement with 23 causes of growth problems which were designed to vary in the degree of personal threat to parenting self-esteem. Ratings were completed for the mother's (Own) baby and for a nonspecific (Other) baby. Findings partially support a theory of defensive attributional bias, with higher agreement when causes referred to Other (vs. Own) baby, and lower agreement with family-related than with medical/nutritional causes. Factors that may have influenced material experience of threat and implications of the findings for clinical practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9212551     DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.3.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol        ISSN: 0146-8693


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth.

Authors:  P Lucas; L Arai; J Baird; J Kleijnen; C Law; H Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Patricia J Lucas; Janis Baird; Lisa Arai; Catherine Law; Helen M Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Maternal perception of the causes and consequences of sibling differences in eating behaviour.

Authors:  L Webber; L Cooke; J Wardle
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.016

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.