Literature DB >> 16905565

A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth.

P Lucas1, L Arai, J Baird, J Kleijnen, C Law, H Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand lay views on infant size and growth and their implications for a British population.
METHODS: A systematic review of parental and other lay views about the meanings and importance of infant size and growth using Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, IBSS, ASSIA, British Nursing Index ChildData, Caredata, SIGLE, Dissertation Abstracts (US), Index to Theses. 19 studies, most of which reported the views of mothers, from the US, Canada, the UK and Finland were reviewed.
RESULTS: Notions of healthy size and growth were dominated by the concept of normality. Participants created norms by assessing and comparing size and growth against several reference points. When size or growth differed from these norms, explanations were sought for factors that would account for this difference. When no plausible explanation could be found, growth or size became a worry for parents.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents consider the importance of contextual factors when judging what is appropriate or healthy growth. For public health advice to be effective, lay, as well as scientific, findings and values need to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16905565      PMCID: PMC2083310          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.087288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  27 in total

1.  Weighing preterm infants before & after breastfeeding: does it increase maternal confidence and competence?

Authors:  Wendy A Hall; Kim Shearer; Judith Mogan; Jonathan Berkowitz
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.412

Review 2.  Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.

Authors:  Angela Harden; Jo Garcia; Sandy Oliver; Rebecca Rees; Jonathan Shepherd; Ginny Brunton; Ann Oakley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden; Ann Oakley; Sandy Oliver; Katy Sutcliffe; Rebecca Rees; Ginny Brunton; Josephine Kavanagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-24

4.  Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  D J Barker; P D Winter; C Osmond; B Margetts; S J Simmonds
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Similarities and differences between women who breastfeed for short and long duration.

Authors:  R J Hewat; D J Ellis
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Postnatal concerns of mothers: an update.

Authors:  M P Smith
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.372

7.  Maternal feeding practices and beliefs and their relationships to overweight in early childhood.

Authors:  A E Baughcum; S W Powers; S B Johnson; L A Chamberlin; C M Deeks; A Jain; R C Whitaker
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.225

8.  The lived experience of families of children who are failing to thrive.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Thomlinson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Information needs and problem solving behavior of parents of infants.

Authors:  K F Pridham
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1984

10.  Maternal psychological determinants of infant obesity. Development and testing of two new instruments.

Authors:  M S Kramer; R G Barr; D G Leduc; C Boisjoly; I B Pless
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1983
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Image or reality: why do infant size and growth matter to parents?

Authors:  Charlotte M Wright; Lawrence T Weaver
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Confusing terminology attempts to define the undefinable.

Authors:  I Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Perceptions of Child Body Size and Health Care Seeking for Undernourished Children in Southern Malawi.

Authors:  Valerie L Flax; Chrissie Thakwalakwa; Ulla Ashorn
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-10-20

4.  "Whatever average is:" understanding African-American mothers' perceptions of infant weight, growth, and health.

Authors:  Amanda L Thompson; Linda Adair; Margaret E Bentley
Journal:  Curr Anthropol       Date:  2014-06

5.  Parent perception of healthy infant and toddler growth.

Authors:  Kelly A Laraway; Leann L Birch; Michele L Shaffer; Ian M Paul
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  The views of professionals toward infant growth.

Authors:  Patricia Lucas; Catherine Law; Janis Baird; Helen Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Parents' views on child physical activity and their implications for physical activity parenting interventions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Georgina F Bentley; Joanna K Goodred; Russell Jago; Simon J Sebire; Patricia J Lucas; Kenneth R Fox; Sarah Stewart-Brown; Katrina M Turner
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Psychosocial and educational outcomes of weight faltering in infancy in ALSPAC.

Authors:  Amelia R Holme; Peter S Blair; Alan M Emond
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  What is normal, healthy growth? Global health, human biology, and parental perspectives.

Authors:  Amanda L Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 10.  Mothers' experiences of bottle-feeding: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  R Lakshman; D Ogilvie; K K Ong
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.