Literature DB >> 9210788

The influence of 2-propanol and acetone on oviposition rate and oviposition site preference for acetic acid and ethanol of Drosophila melanogaster.

K T Eisses1.   

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster strains, homozygous for the alcohol dehydrogenase alleles AdhF, AdhS, and Adhn4 respectively, were tested for oviposition site preference with a Multiple Choice Device consisting of 18 patches per choice disk. Equal numbers of patches with ethanol-, acetic acid-, and water-supplemented medium were offered simultaneously. Patches with acetic acid-supplemented medium were chosen predominantly as oviposition sites. Pretreatment of flies with increasing concentrations of 2-propanol to inhibit alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity resulted not only in a decreasing choice of acetic acid patches, but also in the laying of a decreasing number of eggs. Adh-null mutant flies showed a similar change in behavior pattern after 2-propanol treatment. Therefore it was concluded that ADH activity is not involved primarily in oviposition site preference behavior. A complicating factor is acetone, the oxidation product of 2-propanol, which had an even larger impact on egg production. However, differences in ADH allozymes with respect to biochemical oxidation capacity of secondary alcohols will not necessarily lead to differences between the Adh genotypes in oviposition rates or apparent changes in preferences, due to additional biochemical differences in inhibition rates by acetone of the various allozymes and other enzyme systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9210788     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025697627556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  10 in total

1.  Physiological responses of insects to microbial fermentation products: Insights from the interactions between Drosophila and acetic acid.

Authors:  Geonho Kim; Jia Hsin Huang; John G McMullen; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 2.  The genetics of behavioral alcohol responses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Aylin R Rodan; Adrian Rothenfluh
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.230

3.  Drosophila egg-laying site selection as a system to study simple decision-making processes.

Authors:  Chung-Hui Yang; Priyanka Belawat; Ernst Hafen; Lily Y Jan; Yuh-Nung Jan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ionotropic Receptors Mediate Drosophila Oviposition Preference through Sour Gustatory Receptor Neurons.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Hubert Amrein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ryan M Joseph; Anita V Devineni; Ian F G King; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Natural variation in decision-making behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Paige M Miller; Julia B Saltz; Veronica A Cochrane; Caitlin M Marcinkowski; Raisa Mobin; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Starvation-Induced Dietary Behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster Larvae and Adults.

Authors:  Muhammad Ahmad; Safee Ullah Chaudhary; Ahmed Jawaad Afzal; Muhammad Tariq
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Key Odorants Regulate Food Attraction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Giang; Jianzheng He; Safaa Belaidi; Henrike Scholz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Tissue-specific activation of a single gustatory receptor produces opposing behavioral responses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ryan M Joseph; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species.

Authors:  Matt Sumethasorn; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.