Literature DB >> 19541615

Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila.

Ryan M Joseph1, Anita V Devineni, Ian F G King, Ulrike Heberlein.   

Abstract

Selection of appropriate oviposition sites is essential for progeny survival and fitness in generalist insect species, such as Drosophila melanogaster, yet little is known about the mechanisms regulating how environmental conditions and innate adult preferences are evaluated and balanced to yield the final substrate choice for egg-deposition. Female D. melanogaster are attracted to food containing acetic acid (AA) as an oviposition substrate. However, our observations reveal that this egg-laying preference is a complex process, as it directly opposes an otherwise strong, default behavior of positional avoidance for the same food. We show that 2 distinct sensory modalities detect AA. Attraction to AA-containing food for the purpose of egg-laying relies on the gustatory system, while positional repulsion depends primarily on the olfactory system. Similarly, distinct central brain regions are involved in AA attraction and repulsion. Given this unique situation, in which a single environmental stimulus yields 2 opposing behavioral outputs, we propose that the interaction of egg-laying attraction and positional aversion for AA provides a powerful model for studying how organisms balance competing behavioral drives and integrate signals involved in choice-like processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19541615      PMCID: PMC2698888          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901419106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Oviposition site preference in Drosophila.

Authors:  R C Richmond; J L Gerking
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 2.  Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models.

Authors:  Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The Drosophila Pox neuro gene: control of male courtship behavior and fertility as revealed by a complete dissection of all enhancers.

Authors:  Werner Boll; Markus Noll
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 4.  The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster: a review.

Authors:  R F Stocker
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  [Ecological imprinting and protein biosynthesis. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster Meigen].

Authors:  H Laudien; H H Iken
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1977-06

6.  Behavior genetics of olfactory responses in Drosophila. I. Olfactometry and strain differences in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Fuyama
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Genotype-specific habitat selection for oviposition sites in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  J S Barker; W T Starmer; J C Fogleman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Sex-peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male.

Authors:  E Kubli
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Genetics of food preference in Drosophila sechellia. I. Responses to food attractants.

Authors:  I Higa; Y Fuyama
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  A single population of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behaviour in Drosophila.

Authors:  Greg S B Suh; Allan M Wong; Anne C Hergarden; Jing W Wang; Anne F Simon; Seymour Benzer; Richard Axel; David J Anderson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  76 in total

1.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Drosophila chemotaxis: a first look with neurogenetics.

Authors:  Xiaojing J Gao
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.160

3.  The novel gene tank, a tumor suppressor homolog, regulates ethanol sensitivity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Anita V Devineni; Mark Eddison; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Physiological responses of insects to microbial fermentation products: Insights from the interactions between Drosophila and acetic acid.

Authors:  Geonho Kim; Jia Hsin Huang; John G McMullen; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Competing dopamine neurons drive oviposition choice for ethanol in Drosophila.

Authors:  Reza Azanchi; Karla R Kaun; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Internal amino acid state modulates yeast taste neurons to support protein homeostasis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kathrin Steck; Samuel J Walker; Pavel M Itskov; Célia Baltazar; José-Maria Moreira; Carlos Ribeiro
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Preferential ethanol consumption in Drosophila models features of addiction.

Authors:  Anita V Devineni; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Identification and field evaluation of fermentation volatiles from wine and vinegar that mediate attraction of spotted wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Dong H Cha; Todd Adams; Helmuth Rogg; Peter J Landolt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Mechanisms of odor-tracking: multiple sensors for enhanced perception and behavior.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Marin; Brian J Duistermars; Mark A Frye; Matthieu Louis
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Appetitive and aversive visual learning in freely moving Drosophila.

Authors:  Christopher Schnaitmann; Katrin Vogt; Tilman Triphan; Hiromu Tanimoto
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.