Literature DB >> 9210690

Prospective randomized comparison of cefodizime versus cefuroxime for perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

C Wenisch1, A Bartunek, K Zedtwitz-Liebenstein, M Hiesmayr, B Parschalk, T Pernerstorfer, W Graninger.   

Abstract

The effects of cefodizime and cefuroxime on neutrophil phagocytosis and reactive oxygen production in 54 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were studied. Both drugs were administered twice at a dosage of 40 mg/kg of body weight (pre- and intraoperative). Phagocytic capacity was assessed by measuring the uptake of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by flow cytometry. Reactive oxygen generation after phagocytosis was estimated by determining the amount of dihydrorhodamine 123 converted to rhodamine 123 intracellularly. In both groups the mean phagocytic ability for E. coli and S. aureus decreased during surgery (-21 and -8%, respectively, for the cefodizime group and -39 and -38%, respectively, for the cefuroxime group; P < 0.05 for all). In the cefodizime group a normalization of mean E. coli and S. aureus neutrophil phagocytosis was seen on day 5 (+9 and -4% compared to preoperative values; P > 0.35 for both), whereas in cefuroxime-treated patients phagocytic ability remained depressed (-37 and -31%; P < 0.04 for both). In both groups mean neutrophil reactive oxygen intermediate (ROI) production after E. coli and S. aureus phagocytosis increased during cardiopulmonary bypass (+44 and +83%, respectively, in the cefodizime group and +58 and +73%, respectively, in the cefuroxime group; P < 0.05 for all). One day after surgery E. coli- and S. aureus-driven neutrophil ROI production was not different from the preoperative values (-2 and +12%, respectively, for the cefodizime group and +7 and +15%, respectively, for the cefuroxime group; P > 0.15 for all). Postoperative serum levels of the C-reactive protein on days 2 and 7 were lower in cefodizime-treated patients (19 +/- 6 and 4 +/- 2 mg/liter versus 23 +/- 6 and 11 +/- 5 mg/liter; P < 0.05 for both). In addition to cefodizime's antimicrobial activity during perioperative prophylaxis, its use in coronary artery bypass grafting can prevent procedure-related prolonged postoperative neutrophil phagocytosis impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9210690      PMCID: PMC163964     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  39 in total

1.  Immunodepression after major surgery in normal patients.

Authors:  M S Slade; R L Simmons; E Yunis; L J Greenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Postoperative depression of the lymphocyte response to phytohaemagglutinin.

Authors:  P R Riddle; M C Berenbaum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The effect of surgery on reticuloendothelial function.

Authors:  A J Donovan
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1967-02

4.  Depression of immunologic surveillance by pump-oxygenation perfusion.

Authors:  P Hairston; J P Manos; C D Graber; W H Lee
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Anesthesia and the immune response.

Authors:  D L Bruce; D W Wingard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Cell-mediated immunity is depressed following cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  J A Roth; S H Golub; R A Cukingnan; J Brazier; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Complement activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for generation of C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins.

Authors:  D E Chenoweth; S W Cooper; T E Hugli; R W Stewart; E H Blackstone; J W Kirklin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Complement activation and neutropenia occurring during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  D E Hammerschmidt; D F Stroncek; T K Bowers; C J Lammi-Keefe; D M Kurth; A Ozalins; D M Nicoloff; R C Lillehei; P R Craddock; H S Jacob
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Nosocomial infections in the immunocompromised adult.

Authors:  L S Young
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Effect of cefodizime and ceftriaxone on phagocytic function in patients with severe infections.

Authors:  C Wenisch; B Parschalk; M Hasenhündl; E Wiesinger; W Graninger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

1.  Single-dose cefodizime as infection prophylaxis in abdominal surgery: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  F Thalhammer; F Traunmüller; H J Böhming; D Depisch; W Ilias; U Hollenstein; G Salem; W Wayand; H Burgmann; S Breyer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Influence of cefodizime on pulmonary inflammatory response to heat-killed Klebsiella pneumoniae in mice.

Authors:  Y Bergeron; A M Deslauriers; N Ouellet; M C Gauthier; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Reduction by cefodizime of the pulmonary inflammatory response induced by heat-killed Streptococcus pneumoniae in mice.

Authors:  Y Bergeron; N Ouellet; A M Deslauriers; M Simard; M Olivier; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cefuroxime plasma and tissue concentrations in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: Continuous vs bolus application. A pilot study.

Authors:  Keso Skhirtladze-Dworschak; Doris Hutschala; Georg Reining; Peter Dittrich; Anna Bartunek; Martin Dworschak; Edda M Tschernko
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.335

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.