Literature DB >> 9209200

A more valid measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients.

S Hirany1, D Li, I Jialal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine if the direct low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol assay would provide a more valid measure of LDL cholesterol in diabetic patients compared with the Friedewald equation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fasting plasma from 148 diabetic patients, 40 with insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) and 108 with non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) with triglyceride levels < 400 mg/dL, were analyzed for LDL cholesterol using the Friedewald equation, the direct LDL assay, and beta-quantification. Forty-six diabetic patients with triglyceride levels > or = 400 mg/dL were also studied to determine the validity of the direct LDL cholesterol assay with hypertriglyceridemia.
RESULTS: The friedewald equation and the direct LDL cholesterol assay correlated well with beta-quantification (r = 0.969 and r = 0.971, respectively) for LDL cholesterol determination in diabetic patients. Although the Friedewald equation in comparison with beta-quantification underestimated (8%) LDL cholesterol values in diabetic patients, the direct LDL cholesterol assay had a mean bias of < 1%. Also, the underestimation by the Friedewald equation exceeded 10% for the triglyceride subgroup of 200 to 400 mg/dL. Furthermore, the accuracy of the direct LDL cholesterol assay was superior to the Friedewald equation since LDL cholesterol levels determined by the two methods coincided within +/- 10% of beta-quantification in 85% and 68% of diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.0005). Similar results for both the Friedewald equation and the direct LDL cholesterol assay in comparison with beta-quantification were seen when diabetic patients were subgrouped into IDDM and NIDDM. Also, the direct LDL cholesterol assay appeared to provide a reliable estimate in patients with triglycerides > or = 400 mg/dL.
CONCLUSION: The results of our studies indicate that the direct LDL cholesterol assay is a more reliable and accurate method than the Friedewald formula for LDL cholesterol determination in diabetic patients and is more rapid and cost effective than the reference method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9209200     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00375-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  9 in total

1.  Usefulness of the Martin Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Coronary Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Soie Chung
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol associates with coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetes beyond circulating levels of triglycerides.

Authors:  Stuart B Prenner; Claire K Mulvey; Jane F Ferguson; Michael R Rickels; Anish B Bhatt; Muredach P Reilly
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Impact of glucose and lipid markers on the correlation of calculated and enzymatic measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Qiu-Ting Dong; Ying Gao; Na-Qiong Wu; Yuan-Lin Guo; Cheng-Gang Zhu; Sha Li; Hui-Hui Liu; Ye-Xuan Cao; Hui-Wen Zhang; Xi Zhao; Geng Liu; Qian Dong; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Validation of the friedewald formula in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  José Knopfholz; Caio César Diniz Disserol; Andressa Jardim Pierin; Fernanda Letícia Schirr; Larissa Streisky; Lilian Lumi Takito; Patrícia Massucheto Ledesma; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Marcia Olandoski; Claudio Leinig Pereira da Cunha; Antonio Milton Bandeira
Journal:  Cholesterol       Date:  2014-02-06

5.  Validity of a Novel Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Hideto Chaen; Shigesumi Kinchiku; Masaaki Miyata; Shoko Kajiya; Hitoshi Uenomachi; Toshinori Yuasa; Kunitsugu Takasaki; Mitsuru Ohishi
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 4.928

6.  Correlation of Friedewald's calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Nanda; M Bharathy; Asha Dinakaran; Lopamudra Ray; K Ravichandran
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Apolipoprotein B but not LDL cholesterol is associated with coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetic whites.

Authors:  Seth S Martin; Atif N Qasim; Nehal N Mehta; Megan Wolfe; Karen Terembula; Stanley Schwartz; Nayyar Iqbal; Mark Schutta; Roshanak Bagheri; Muredach P Reilly
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Optimal range of triglyceride values to estimate serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in Korean adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009.

Authors:  You-Cheol Hwang; Hong-Yup Ahn; In-Kyung Jeong; Kyu Jeung Ahn; Ho Yeon Chung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Martin's Equation as the Most Suitable Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Korean Adults.

Authors:  Mijeong Kang; Jongwoo Kim; Seon Yeong Lee; Kyunam Kim; Junehyung Yoon; Hongseok Ki
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2017-09-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.