Literature DB >> 9208962

The miniscule benefit of serial carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring after effective curative treatment for primary colorectal cancer.

R F Wolf1, A M Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels have been recommended to detect asymptomatic recurrent colorectal cancer and to facilitate curative additional therapy. This study was designed to investigate the outcome of additional treatment for recurrent cancer in patients undergoing primary colorectal cancer treatment in a specialty center and subsequent relapsing with an elevation in serum CEA. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients treated for their primary cancers at our institution whose followup included CEA monitoring and whose cancers subsequently recurred, were analyzed from a prospective database of almost 1,900 patients. CEA levels of > or = 5 ng/mL were considered elevated for purposes of treatment results. One hundred sixty-three patients were suitable for analysis. Median followup before and after recurrence was 14 months and 16 months, respectively.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were able to undergo complete resection of their recurrence, and 26 of these patients are without evidence of recurrence at last followup. Two-thirds of recurrences were associated with an elevation of CEA; this elevation at recurrence was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.05, Kaplan Meier). Of the 109 patients with an elevation of CEA at recurrence, complete re-resection was accomplished in 26 patients. Of these, half remain cancer free. Of those with a normal CEA at recurrence, complete re-resection was feasible in 24 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Only 17% of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer undergoing potentially curative reresection have an elevated CEA. If we use the denominator of our patient population using an estimated relapse rate of 25-50%, the overall likelihood of CEA-directed curative re-resection confirms early estimates of less than a 5% survival advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9208962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Immunoscintigraphy of local recurrent rectal cancer with 99mTc-labeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody CL58.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Yao; Zhi Yang; Zhen-Fu Li; Jin Gu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Annual colonoscopy, chest radiography, and computed tomography of the liver did not prolong survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Fairclough; B Haynes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Physician follow-up and observation of guidelines in the post treatment surveillance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gabriela M Vargas; Kristin M Sheffield; Abhishek D Parmar; Yimei Han; Kimberly M Brown; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Tumor angiogenesis predicts recurrence with normal serum carcinoembryonic antigen in advanced rectal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  H Ishikawa; H Fujii; K Yamamoto; T Morita; M Hata; F Koyama; S Terauchi; S Sugimori; T Kobayashi; H Enomoto; S Yoshikawa; T Nishikawa; H Nakano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Elevated serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II and IGF binding protein-2 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A G Renehan; J Jones; C S Potten; S M Shalet; S T O'Dwyer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Bethany Shinkins; Indika Pathiraja; Nia W Roberts; Tim J James; Susan Mallett; Rafael Perera; John N Primrose; David Mant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.