Literature DB >> 9203601

Anastomotic complications in minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting.

S Pagni1, N K Qaqish, D G Senior, P A Spence.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior wall myocardial revascularization through a left anterior minithoracotomy is an increasingly accepted procedure. Technical failure at the anastomotic site, promoting persistent or recurrent angina, is known to occur and may be underrecognized. This report summarizes the incidence of technical failure in an initial clinical experience and describes potential causes of early postoperative complications.
METHODS: Between December 1995 and May 1996, 15 patients underwent left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending artery revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. The surgical indication was single-vessel coronary disease in all patients. We exposed the left anterior descending artery target site through a 10-cm left anterior fourth space thoracotomy. The fourth costal cartilage was resected and the left internal mammary artery was harvested under direct visualization. Two 4-0 polypropylene sutures snared in tourniquets proximal and distal to the anastomotic site were used to obtain a bloodless field and stabilization of the left anterior descending artery.
RESULTS: All patients had procedures initially deemed successful based on disappearance of angina or postoperative transthoracic Doppler examination of the internal mammary artery 3 to 5 days postoperatively. However, 3 patients presented with recurrent angina at 2, 6, and 8 weeks. Angiography or direct visualization at operation demonstrated the technical complication (stenosis at the anastomotic site in 2 and snare injury in the native vessel in 1). Two patients required reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: Initial results with minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting have generated great enthusiasm worldwide, but there is no consensus on how the procedure should be performed. These results suggest that a nonstabilized anastomosis results in an unacceptable failure rate. Furthermore, sutures encircling the left anterior descending artery should not be used for vessel stabilization as injury of the artery may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9203601     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00416-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of standard coronary artery bypass grafting and minimary invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Early and mid-term result.

Authors:  Y Okawa; H Baba; M Hashimoto; T Tanaka; M Toyama; K Matsumoto; K Azuma
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-11

2.  A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; William C Watson; S Scott Davis; Kristen Hinshaw; Bradley J Needleman; Dean J Mikami; Jeffrey W Hazey; John H Winston; P Muscarella; Mike Rubin; Vipul Patel; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Limited-access coronary artery bypass grafting. The Texas Heart Institute experience.

Authors:  N G Talwalkar; D A Cooley; D A Ott; J J Livesay
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1998

4.  Prospective clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary grafting with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  S M Prasad; C T Ducko; E R Stephenson; C E Chambers; R J Damiano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Authors:  A Nabuchi; A Kurata; K Tsukuda; H Tajima; K I Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-12

Review 6.  Anesthetic challenges in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: Are we moving in a right direction?

Authors:  Vishwas Malik; Ajay Kumar Jha; Poonam Malhotra Kapoor
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.