Literature DB >> 11144093

Comparison of standard coronary artery bypass grafting and minimary invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Early and mid-term result.

Y Okawa1, H Baba, M Hashimoto, T Tanaka, M Toyama, K Matsumoto, K Azuma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied indications and problems involved in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB).
METHODS: We compared patients profiles, graft patency, stenosis severity, morbidity, mortality, long-term survival and freedom from cardiac accidents in 174 patients undergoing elective standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 128 undergoing between January 1996 and March 1999.
RESULTS: No statistically difference was seen in gender, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, multi-vessel disease ratios, or left main trunk stenosis between 2 groups. Internal thoracic artery graft patency was 97% (114/118) and the rate of anastomotic stenosis (> 50%) was 9% (10/118) compared to 96% (213/221) in the MIDCAB group. The 3-year survival rate was 91% in the MIDCAB group and 92% in the CABG group and freedom from cardiac accidents, most involving pericutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty retreatment, was 66% in the MIDCAB group and 88% in the CABG group.
CONCLUSION: Although patency and stenosis incidence did not differ between 2 groups, freedom from cardiac accidents was lower in the MIDCAB group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144093     DOI: 10.1007/BF03218240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1344-4964


  8 in total

1.  Anastomotic complications in minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting.

Authors:  S Pagni; N K Qaqish; D G Senior; P A Spence
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Less invasive arterial CABG on a beating heart.

Authors:  V A Subramanian
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery.

Authors:  T Walther; V Falk; S Metz; A Diegeler; R Battellini; R Autschbach; F W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  J Butler; G M Rocker; S Westaby
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Video assisted coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  F J Benetti; C Ballester; G Sani; P Doonstra; J Grandjean
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.620

6.  Acute renal failure associated with cardiac operations. A case-control study.

Authors:  H L Corwin; S M Sprague; G A DeLaria; M J Norusis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients.

Authors:  F J Benetti; G Naselli; M Wood; L Geffner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Major sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery: a multivariate analysis of risk factors in 2,579 consecutive operative procedures.

Authors:  G Ottino; R De Paulis; S Pansini; G Rocca; M V Tallone; C Comoglio; P Costa; F Orzan; M Morea
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.330

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Sheena Garg; Melissa Rochon; Siobhan Daley; Fabio De Robertis; Toufan Bahrami
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.