Literature DB >> 9203588

Clinical assessment of functional stenosis severity: use of coronary pressure measurements for the decision to bypass a lesion.

N H Pijls1, G J Bech, B De Bruyne, A van Straten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the selection of patients eligible for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG), knowledge about the pathophysiologic significance of individual coronary stenoses is important. Only if the lesion amenable to MICABG can be identified as the culprit lesion, and other lesions can be demonstrated not to be responsible for reversible ischemia, will MICABG be an appropriate procedure.
METHODS: By simultaneous measurement of mean aortic pressure and transstenotic coronary pressure, a pathophysiologic index can be obtained that specifically indicates the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on maximum achievable blood flow of the supplied myocardial territory. This index is called myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR(myo)).
RESULTS: Myocardial fractional flow reserve is a reliable, lesion-specific index for determining whether a particular stenosis is responsible for reversible myocardial ischemia. If FFR(myo) is less than 0.75, revascularization is indicated, whereas if FFR(myo) is greater than 0.75, revascularization usually is not warranted. Moreover, in contrast to classic coronary flow or flow velocity reserve, FFR(myo) is independent of changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and contractility, and also accounts for the contribution of collaterals.
CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-derived FFR(myo) is an accurate pathophysiologic index for reliable identification of functionally significant epicardial lesions and can be obtained easily and quickly during routine cardiac catheterization. Therefore, FFR(myo) facilitates clinical decision-making with respect to the appropriateness of MICABG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9203588     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00418-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests.

Authors:  Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Nina van der Hoeven; Tim P van de Hoef; Julius Heemelaar; Nicola Ryan; Amir Lerman; Niels van Royen; Javier Escaned
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  [Methods for coronary functional assessment].

Authors:  M Elsner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Functional assessment of cerebral artery stenosis: A pilot study based on computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Zhengzheng Yan; Yuehua Pu; Wen-Shin Shiu; Jianhuang Wu; Rongliang Chen; Xinyi Leng; Haiqiang Qin; Xin Liu; Baixue Jia; Ligang Song; Yilong Wang; Zhongrong Miao; Yongjun Wang; Liping Liu; Xiao-Chuan Cai
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Invasive and non-invasive fractional flow reserve index in validation of hemodynamic severity of intracoronary lesions.

Authors:  Jarosław Wasilewski; Kryspin Mirota; Michał Hawranek; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  The Same Angiographic Factors Predict Venous and Arterial Graft Patency: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Giampaolo Niccoli; Marco Roberto; Federico Cammertoni; Nicola Cosentino; Elena Falcioni; Mario Panebianco; Domenico D'Amario; Filippo Crea; Massimo Massetti
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.