PURPOSE: This late effects study was designed to determine if survivors of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFT) had adverse outcomes in employment, marital status, fertility, and functional status when compared to sibling controls. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine survivors (case subjects) of ESFT treated at the National Cancer Institute between 1965 and 1992 and 97 sibling controls completed a questionnaire probing aspects of quality of life. The answers from case subjects were compared to pooled and matched sibling controls for all key variables. Odds ratios (OR) and p values from pooled analyses are presented. RESULTS: Although case subjects and controls did not differ in educational achievement, case subjects were less likely to be employed full-time (OR 0.4, p < 0.01), to be married (OR 0.2, p < 0.01), and to have children (OR 0.3, p < 0.01). Their most common treatment-related difficulties included permanent hair and skin changes (43%), lung problems (18%), neurologic problems (14%), visual difficulties (10%), second malignancy (7%), and amputation (5%). Functional status, measured by Karnofsky performance scale, was also adversely affected in case subjects. Case subjects did not differ from sibling controls in health care insurance status or in utilization of health services. CONCLUSIONS: Important aspects of life such as employment, marital status, fertility, and functional status are affected in survivors of ESFT. More studies are needed to better define the health status of adult survivors of pediatric cancer and the impact of cancer in adolescence on psychosocial development.
PURPOSE: This late effects study was designed to determine if survivors of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFT) had adverse outcomes in employment, marital status, fertility, and functional status when compared to sibling controls. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine survivors (case subjects) of ESFT treated at the National Cancer Institute between 1965 and 1992 and 97 sibling controls completed a questionnaire probing aspects of quality of life. The answers from case subjects were compared to pooled and matched sibling controls for all key variables. Odds ratios (OR) and p values from pooled analyses are presented. RESULTS: Although case subjects and controls did not differ in educational achievement, case subjects were less likely to be employed full-time (OR 0.4, p < 0.01), to be married (OR 0.2, p < 0.01), and to have children (OR 0.3, p < 0.01). Their most common treatment-related difficulties included permanent hair and skin changes (43%), lung problems (18%), neurologic problems (14%), visual difficulties (10%), second malignancy (7%), and amputation (5%). Functional status, measured by Karnofsky performance scale, was also adversely affected in case subjects. Case subjects did not differ from sibling controls in health care insurance status or in utilization of health services. CONCLUSIONS: Important aspects of life such as employment, marital status, fertility, and functional status are affected in survivors of ESFT. More studies are needed to better define the health status of adult survivors of pediatric cancer and the impact of cancer in adolescence on psychosocial development.
Authors: Bradley J Stish; Safia K Ahmed; Peter S Rose; Carola A Arndt; Nadia N Laack Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; I-Chan Huang; Devin Murphy; Katie Zidonik-Eddelton; Kevin R Krull Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Tara M Brinkman; Kelly Kenzik; James G Gurney; Kirsten K Ness; Jennifer Lanctot; Elizabeth Shenkman; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Pey-Shan Wen; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Dennis A Revicki; Kevin Krull; Zhushan Li; Patricia D Shearer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Kevin Krull; Katie Z Eddleton; Devin C Murphy; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Patricia D Shearer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jill P Ginsberg; Pamela Goodman; Wendy Leisenring; Kirsten K Ness; Paul A Meyers; Suzanne L Wolden; Stephanie M Smith; Marilyn Stovall; Sue Hammond; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 11.816