Literature DB >> 9199591

Clinical effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.

G B Anderson1, J Bowden, E C Morrison, R G Caffesse.   

Abstract

This study compared the short-term clinical effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate and placebo mouthrinses in 30 adolescents (ages 11 to 15) undergoing orthodontic treatment. Subjects were randomized into experimental (CHX) and control (C) groups. Baseline values were recorded 10 days after prophylaxis and included Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Rentention Index (RI), Discoloration index (DI), and probing depths (PD). Both groups (CHX and C) received soft toothbrushes with instructions to brush twice daily, as well as the CHX and placebo mouthrinses, respectively, with oral and written instructions for rinsing twice daily with 15 ml for 30 seconds. Reevaluations were performed 1, 2, and 3 months after baseline, except for the DI and PD, which were only assessed at 3 months. The Student's t test and the paired t test were used to analyze the data at the P < 0.05 level of significance. No differences between groups were seen at baseline for any of the parameters. At 30 days, there was a significant difference for the RI between CHX (0.15 +/- 0.16; mean +/- SD) and C (0.05 +/- 0.06) at the mesial buccal, and for CHX (0.07 +/- 0.10) and C (0.02 +/- 0.05) at the midbuccal. The 60-day evaluation showed similar results. At 90 days, lower PI were observed in the CHX group at the distal buccal (0.38 +/- 0.19), midbuccal (0.22 +/- 0.17), and mesial buccal (0.47 +/- 0.22) sites as compared with the C group (0.97 +/- 0.38, 0.83 +/- 0.40, and 0.95 +/- 0.43, respectively). A similar trend was noted with the GI, as the lower values were related to the CHX group. The changes of the PI and GI, at 30, 60, and 90 days, as analyzed by the paired t test, were statistically significant in the case of the experimental group, as the changes in the means were a reflection of significantly lower scores observed in the experimental group. After 3 months, the DI showed higher scores in the experimental group as compared with the control, but they were not statistically significant. Deeper PD were detected in the C group at 90 days, and they were statistically significant, except for the midlingual site. The RI did not show significant differences at 90 days, but higher values were recorded in the CHX group. The data indicate that the use of the CHX, in addition to regular oral hygiene habits, was effective in reducing plaque and gingivitis in adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9199591     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70312-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  17 in total

1.  The influence of a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque regrowth in orthodontic patients. A randomized prospective study. Part I: clinical parameters.

Authors:  I Gehlen; L Netuschil; R Berg; E Reich; C Katsaros
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of Aloe vera, chlorine dioxide, and chlorhexidine mouth rinses on plaque and gingivitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sravan Kumar Yeturu; Shashidhar Acharya; Arun Sreenivas Urala; Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-09-11

Review 3.  Quantifying plaque during orthodontic treatment:.

Authors:  Saud A Al-Anezi; Nigel W T Harradine
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effect of three different motivational techniques on oral hygiene and gingival health of patients undergoing multibracketed orthodontics.

Authors:  Shivesh Acharya; Ashima Goyal; Ashok Kumar Utreja; Utkal Mohanty
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.

Authors:  Patrice James; Helen V Worthington; Carmel Parnell; Mairead Harding; Thomas Lamont; Andrea Cheung; Helen Whelton; Philip Riley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  Chlorhexidine varnishes effectively inhibit Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans - an in vivo study.

Authors:  Ashwin Mathew George; Suresh Kumar Kalangi; Mithuna Vasudevan; N R Krishnaswamy
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2010-07

7.  Efficacy of light-activated sealant on enamel demineralization in orthodontic patients: an atomic force microscope evaluation.

Authors:  Suzi F Shinaishin; Safaa A Ghobashy; Tarek H El-Bialy
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-11-23

8.  The Effects of Using Plaque-Disclosing Tablets on the Removal of Plaque and Gingival Status of Orthodontic Patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Yavan; Sayad Kocahan; Serhat Özdemir; Oral Sökücü
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-12-01

9.  Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Tabassom Hooshmand; Habibeh Farazdaghi; Arash Mehrabi; Elham S Emadian Razavi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Surface characterization and frictional force between stainless steel brackets and archwires in orthodontic patients using chlorhexidine- and Persica-containing mouthrinses: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elham-Sadat Emadian Razavi; Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Tabassom Hooshmand; Habibeh Farazdaghi; Arian Hesam Arefi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.