Literature DB >> 21760672

Chlorhexidine varnishes effectively inhibit Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans - an in vivo study.

Ashwin Mathew George1, Suresh Kumar Kalangi, Mithuna Vasudevan, N R Krishnaswamy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine varnish (Cervitec- Ivoclar Vivadent- Liechtenstein) is a sustained-release delivery system that can provide protection against white spots and gingivitis, which are common iatrogenic side effects of orthodontic treatment. Chlorhexidine in varnish form does not depend on patient compliance, does not stain teeth or alter taste sensation like the mouth rinse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A split-mouth technique was followed in the treatment of 30 patients selected by stringent selection criteria, evaluating a single application of the test varnish on two randomly allotted quadrants along with a placebo on the other two quadrants. Streptococcus mutans counts responsible for white spots and P. gingivalis count [using PCR test] responsible for gingivitis were done at the start of the study, and then 1 and 3 months later.
RESULTS: The chlorhexidine varnish reduced the Streptococci mutans count at the end of 1 month, and this reduction was statistically significant. At the end of 3 months, there was no difference in the S. mutans counts between the two groups. There was a statistically significant reduction in the P. gingivalis count at the end of both 1 and 3 months in comparison to the placebo group.
CONCLUSION: Chlorhexidine varnishes are capable of reducing S. mutans and P. gingivalis and gingivitis, thus improving the overall oral health of the patient. The side effects of chlorhexidine mouth rinses are not seen with this varnish. An application schedule of at least once a month is recommended as the effectiveness is reduced comparatively at the end of 3 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlorhexidine varnish; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Streptococcus mutans

Year:  2010        PMID: 21760672      PMCID: PMC3100861          DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.75913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol        ISSN: 0972-124X


INTRODUCTION

The effects of orthodontic treatment on the periodontium have been well documented.[1] Difficulty in institution of an adequate oral hygiene program and subsequent gingival inflammation is a commonly observed phenomenon following placement of orthodontic appliances. In addition, it has also been reported that placement of bands, brackets may lead to a change in the microflora, leading to an increase in the levels of periodontopathogenic organisms like Porphyromonas gingivalis. Decalcification or white spot formation resulting from an imbalance between demineralization and remineralization of enamel has also been frequently reported to be associated with orthodontic treatment. Streptococcus mutans is found to be associated with the initiation and development of caries, and a significant increase in salivary and plaque levels is seen as early as the first week after placement of the appliance.[2] This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of Cervitec varnish [chlorhexidine and thymol] on Streptococcus mutans in supragingival plaque and Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque. A split-mouth technique was followed in the treatment of 30 patients selected by stringent selection criteria, evaluating a single application of the test varnish on two randomly allotted quadrants along with a placebo on the other two quadrants. Streptococcus mutans count responsible for white spots and Porphyromonas gingivalis count [using Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test] responsible for gingivitis were done at the start of study, and then 1 and 3 months later. Plaque sample collection (supragingival and subgingival) and evaluation of gingival condition was carried out at three different times: Baseline (T=0) — prior to varnish application One month (T=1) after varnish application Three months (T=3) after varnish application Gingival parameters like gingival index by Ramfjord, plaque index by Silness and Loe and bleeding index by Muhlemann were also assessed at these times.

RESULTS

Evaluation of S. mutans count

Chlorhexidine varnish reduced Streptococcus mutans count at the end of 1 month (T1), and this reduction was statistically significant as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. At the end of 3 months, there was no difference in the mutans count between the two groups.
Table 1

Streptococcus mutans count in supragingival plaque

TimeGroupNumber of SamplesMean CFU (Log) /MlStd. Dev.P valueInference
T0Placebo303.71030.38820.208Not significant
Chlorhexidine303.84460.4271
T1Placebo303.81420.42580.026Significant
Chlorhexidine303.56590.4187
T3Placebo303.94480.46430.252Not significant
Chlorhexidine303.80880.4465

T0= Baseline, prior to varnish application; T1= One month after varnish application, T3= Three months after varnish application

Figure 1

M. S. B. agar with colonies of Streptococcus mutans before application of chlorhexidine varnish and 1 month after application of chlorhexidine varnish

M. S. B. agar with colonies of Streptococcus mutans before application of chlorhexidine varnish and 1 month after application of chlorhexidine varnish Streptococcus mutans count in supragingival plaque T0= Baseline, prior to varnish application; T1= One month after varnish application, T3= Three months after varnish application

Evaluation of Porphyromonas gingivalis count

There was a statistically significant reduction in the Porphyromonas gingivalis count at the end of one (T1) month and three (T3) months in the chlorhexidine varnish group in comparison to the placebo group as shown in the Table 2 and Figures 2–4
Table 2

Porphyromonas gingivalis (Fim A) expression in subgingival plaque

TimeGroupNumbers of SamplesP. Gingivalis (Fim A)Percentage
T0 Placebo3016.66
Chlorhexidine3016.66
T1Placebo30320
Chlorhexidine3000
T3Placebo30320
Chlorhexidine3000
Figure 2

Expression of P. gingivalis fim A before varnish application

Figure 4

Expression of P. gingivalis fi m A 3 months after varnish application

Expression of P. gingivalis fim A before varnish application Expression of P. gingivalis fim A 1 month after varnish application Expression of P. gingivalis fi m A 3 months after varnish application Porphyromonas gingivalis (Fim A) expression in subgingival plaque

Evaluation of plaque index, gingival index and bleeding index

There was a statistically significant reduction in the scores on gingival index, plaque index and bleeding index in the chlorhexidine varnish group in comparison to the placebo group at the end of 1 month and 3 months as shown in Tables 3–5.
Table 3

Gingival index

TimeGingival scoreGroups
P valueInference
PlaceboChlorhexidine
T00551.00Not significant
199
211
T10390.005Significant
175
251
T300100.00Significant
154
2101
Table 5

Bleeding index

TimescoreGroups
P valueInference
PlaceboChlorhexidine
T00671.00Not significant
198
200
T105120.025Significant
1103
200
T303130.001Significant
1122
200
Gingival index Plaque index Bleeding index

DISCUSSION

Over the past few decades, chlorhexidine has evolved into the gold standard among the antimicrobial substances used in dentistry. Chlorhexidine and thymol (Cervitec varnish) interact and adhere to the pellicle proteins or other constituents, establishing a reservoir from which chlorhexidine can be slowly released over time. Both molecules also react with the salivary proteins and salivary bacteria, thus participating in the reduction of the amount of plaque, and of the count of S. mutans. The results of this study indicated that a single application of the test varnish was capable of significantly reducing S. mutans count and Porphyromonas gingivalis count at the end of first month. However, it was noted that the test varnish had no effect on S. mutans at the end of 3 months. Porphyromonas gingivalis levels were, however, significantly lower even at the end of 3 months. Recent studies have evaluated the effect of supragingival plaque on subgingival biofilm formation and shown a direct and positive correlation.[3] As the plaque scores were significantly lower in the test group, the P. gingivalis levels were correspondingly low. The importance of co-aggration in biofilm formation has been previously documented, with P. gingivalis being shown to co-aggregate with several oral streptococci, especially S. gordonii of supragingival plaque.[4] A significant reduction in the levels of these organisms as a result of decreased supragingival plaque could have contributed to the observed reduction in P. gingivalis count. Porphyromonas gingivalis has been recently described as a host-associated pathogen, and its role in initiation of periodontal disease is well recognized.[5] It has also been shown that chlorhexidine reduces the level of inflammatory mediators; and also reduces the amount of gingival crevicular fluid, which is an indicator of inflammation. This effect of Cervitec on the gingival crevicular fluid and archidonic acid metabolites PGE2, PGI2 and LTB4 could also be the reason for the improvement of gingival health as seen till the end of 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Chlorhexidine varnishes are capable of reducing Streptococci mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and gingivitis, thus improving the overall oral health of the patient. The side effects that are seen with the long-term use of chlorhexidine mouth rinses are not seen with this new mode of delivery, viz., chlorhexidine application in varnish form. Chlorhexidine application in varnish form does not depend on patient compliance; does not stain teeth, tongue, the mucosa and composite restoration or alter taste sensation. An application schedule of at least once a month is recommended, as the effectiveness is reduced comparatively at the end of 3 months, especially when controlling S. mutans responsible for white spot lesions.
Table 4

Plaque index

TimePlaque scoreGroups
P valueInference
PlaceboChlorhexidine
T00041.00Not significant
11010
211
300
T10190.001Significant
166
280
300
T30090.00Significant
126
2110
320
  5 in total

Review 1.  Periodontal microbial ecology.

Authors:  Sigmund S Socransky; Anne D Haffajee
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 2.  Bacterial adhesins to host components in periodontitis.

Authors:  Atsuo Amano
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.589

3.  Clinical effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  G B Anderson; J Bowden; E C Morrison; R G Caffesse
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Chlorhexidine varnishes: a review.

Authors:  S Matthijs; P A Adriaens
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Subgingival biofilm formation.

Authors:  Masae Kuboniwa; Richard J Lamont
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.589

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Sustained release of a novel anti-quorum-sensing agent against oral fungal biofilms.

Authors:  Mark Feldman; Julia Shenderovich; Abed Al Aziz Al-Quntar; Michael Friedman; Doron Steinberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of clinical effectiveness of single and multiple applications of 1% chlorhexidine varnish (Cervitec Plus) along with scaling and root planing in patients with chronic periodontitis.

Authors:  Sonia Sachdeva; Vishakha Grover; Ranjan Malhotra; Anoop Kapoor; Kanishk Mohanty
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

3.  Effects of amine fluoride and probiotic mouthwash on levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Neeraj Goyal; Pavithra Untagodu Shamanna; Sanju Thomas Varughese; Reji Abraham; Bobby Antony; Rishi Emmatty; Parson Paul
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

4.  Effectiveness of caries-preventing agents on initial carious lesions within the scope of orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Park; Tessa Kroker; Uwe Groß; Ortrud Zimmermann; Felix Krause; Rainer Haak; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Potential Combinatory Effect of Cannabidiol and Triclosan Incorporated into Sustained Release Delivery System against Oral Candidiasis.

Authors:  Mark Feldman; Irith Gati; Ronit Vogt Sionov; Sharonit Sahar-Helft; Michael Friedman; Doron Steinberg
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.525

6.  Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Fluoride and the Combined Use of Chlorhexidine and Fluoride Varnishes on Salivary Streptococcus mutans Count in Children with Mixed Dentition: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Vanita P More; Shivayogi M Hugar; Suma Sogi; Rohan S Bhambar; Suganya M; Shweta Hugar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2022 May-Jun

7.  Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population.

Authors:  Ozgul Baygin; Tamer Tuzuner; Mehmet-Birol Ozel; Ozge Bostanoglu
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  Characteristics of Bubble Oscillations During Laser-Activated Irrigation of Root Canals and Method of Improvement.

Authors:  Matjaž Lukač; Nejc Lukač; Matija Jezeršek
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.025

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.