Literature DB >> 9197933

Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries.

D Tantbirojn1, W H Douglas, A Versluis.   

Abstract

Glass ionomer cements (GICs) demonstrate the inhibition of caries lesions formed immediately adjacent to the restoration. This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the distance at which a resin-modified GIC is able to exert its cariostatic effect on artificial enamel lesions ('remote effect'). Resin-modified GIC or bis-GMA resin was applied on the cervical third of the labial surface of 10 paired halves of bovine incisors. Specimens were separately immersed for 3 weeks in lactic acid gel which was changed every other day to reduce fluoride accumulation. Artificial lesions were examined by the cross-sectional microhardness (MHN) method. Volume percent mineral, mineral loss (delta Z value) and change in mineral content (delta M) were computed for each MHN profile, performed at distances of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 7.0 mm from the edge of the materials. delta Z values of the resin-modified GIC group were significantly lower than those of the bis-GMA control group at all remote sites (t test, p < 0.05). The delta M caused by resin-modified GIC was more pronounced within 1.0 mm from the material which suggested that the demineralization inhibition can be divided into the near effect (< 1.0 mm). In this in vitro study, resin-modified GIC provided caries resistance in bovine enamel located at a considerable distance from the margin of the material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9197933     DOI: 10.1159/000262411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Real-time measurement of in vitro enamel demineralization in the vicinity of the restoration-tooth interface.

Authors:  S E Dowker; P Anderson; J C Elliott
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  V Yengopal; S Mickenautsch
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2011-02

3.  Influence of cavity preparation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser and restorative materials on in situ secondary caries development.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Tedesco Jorge; Alessandra Cassoni; Patrícia Moreira de Freitas; André Figueiredo Reis; Aldo Brugnera Junior; Jose Augusto Rodrigues
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 4.  Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements versus resin-based materials as fissure sealants: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  V Yengopal; S Mickenautsch
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-02

5.  Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements-An in vitro study.

Authors:  Yasemin Dziuk; Sachin Chhatwani; Stephan C Möhlhenrich; Sabrina Tulka; Ella A Naumova; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of the amount of fluoride release from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Sumitha Upadhyay; Arathi Rao; Ramya Shenoy
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.