Literature DB >> 9197291

Effects of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal function: comparison with high-flow sevoflurane anesthesia and low-flow isoflurane anesthesia.

H Bito1, Y Ikeuchi, K Ikeda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, during which CF2=C(CF3)-O-CH2F (compound A) is formed by sevoflurane degradation, in humans has been questioned because compound A is nephrotoxic in rats. Several reports have evaluated renal function after closed-circuit or low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, using blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine as markers. However, these are not the more sensitive tests for detecting renal damage. This study assessed the effects of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal function using not only BUN and serum creatinine but also creatinine clearance and urinary excretion of kidney-specific enzymes, and it compared these values with those obtained in high-flow sevoflurane anesthesia and low-flow isoflurane anesthesia.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy were studied. Patients were randomized to receive sevoflurane anesthesia with fresh gas flow of 1 l/min (low-flow sevoflurane group; n = 16) or 6-10 l/min (high-flow sevoflurane group; n = 16) or isoflurane anesthesia with a fresh gas flow of 1 l/min (low-flow isoflurane group; n = 16). In all groups, the carrier gas was oxygen/nitrous oxide in the ratio adjusted to ensure a fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired gas (FiO2) of more than 0.3. Fresh Baralyme was used in the low-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane groups. Glass balls were used instead in the high-flow sevoflurane group, with the fresh gas flow rate adjusted to eliminate rebreathing. The compound A concentration was measured by gas chromatography. Gas samples taken from the inspiratory limb of the circle system at 1-h intervals were analyzed. Blood samples were obtained before and on days 1, 2, and 3 after anesthesia to measure BUN and serum creatinine. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected before anesthesia and for each 24-h period from 0 to 72 h after anesthesia to measure creatinine, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and alanine aminopeptidase.
RESULTS: The average inspired concentration of compound A was 20 +/- 7.8 ppm (mean +/- SD), and the average duration of exposure to this concentration was 6.11 +/- 1.77 h in the low-flow sevoflurane group. Postanesthesia BUN and serum creatinine concentrations decreased, creatinine clearance increased, and urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and alanine aminopeptidase excretion increased in all groups compared with preanesthesia values, but there were no significant differences between the low-flow sevoflurane, high-flow sevoflurane, and low-flow isoflurane groups for any renal function parameter at any time after anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: The only difference between the low-flow and high-flow sevoflurane groups was compound A formation, and postanesthesia laboratory data showed no significant effects of compound A formation during sevoflurane anesthesia on renal function. No significant effects on renal function were observed in either the low-flow or high-flow sevoflurane groups compared with the low-flow isoflurane group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9197291     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199706000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sevoflurane in paediatric anaesthesia: a review.

Authors:  K L Goa; S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Volatile anesthetics and AKI: risks, mechanisms, and a potential therapeutic window.

Authors:  Kyota Fukazawa; H Thomas Lee
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Sevoflurance: approaching the ideal inhalational anesthetic. a pharmacologic, pharmacoeconomic, and clinical review.

Authors:  L Delgado-Herrera; R D Ostroff; S A Rogers
Journal:  CNS Drug Rev       Date:  2001

Review 4.  Renal toxicity with sevoflurane: a storm in a teacup?

Authors:  B A Gentz; T P Malan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane.

Authors:  M Behne; H J Wilke; S Harder
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Cost analysis of three techniques of administering sevoflurane.

Authors:  Asha Tyagi; Vineeta Venkateswaran; Ajai Kumar Jain; Uttam Chandra Verma
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-10-29

Review 7.  The impact of sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Rakesh V Sondekoppam; Karim H Narsingani; Trent A Schimmel; Brie M McConnell; Karen Buro; Timur J-P Özelsel
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.713

8.  Kidney function in living donors undergoing nephrectomy by sevoflurane or desflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jeong-Rim Lee; Myoung-Soo Kim; Sung-Yeon Ham; Seung-Ho Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Case report: proximal tubule impairment following volatile anesthetic exposure.

Authors:  Evan C Ray; Khaled Abdel-Kader; Nicholas Bircher; Helbert Rondon-Berrios
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-09

10.  Sevoflurane and renal function: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Lady Christine L Ong Sio; Richard Glenn C Dela Cruz; Alexander F Bautista
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2017-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.