Literature DB >> 9194654

No evidence of deteriorating semen quality among men in infertile relationships during the last decade: a study of males from Southern Sweden.

S Berling1, P Wölner-Hanssen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the quality of semen has deteriorated during the last decade. Laboratory records containing semen analysis results were reviewed. The records, arranged according to date of birth, are kept in shelves. Every fifth record for analyses performed between 1985 and 1995, and only those of men in infertile relationships, were included. The data were abstracted in a data base, and time-related changes in semen characteristics were studied using linear regression analyses. During the study period, there was a slight, but significant increase in sperm concentration, percentage of motile spermatozoa, percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology, and the base-value of the penetration test. The seminal volumes decreased slightly, but significantly. Sperm characteristics were not associated with age or date of birth of the men. In conclusion, these data show no evidence of deterioration in sperm quality during the last decade among men in infertile relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9194654     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.5.1002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Myth and reality of the decline in semen quality: an example of the relativity of data interpretation.

Authors:  L Gandini; F Lombardo; F Culasso; F Dondero; A Lenzi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Decline of semen quality among 10 932 males consulting for couple infertility over a 20-year period in Marseille, France.

Authors:  Cendrine Geoffroy-Siraudin; Anderson Dieudonné Loundou; Fanny Romain; Vincent Achard; Blandine Courbière; Marie-Hélène Perrard; Philippe Durand; Marie-Roberte Guichaoua
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Trends in global semen parameter values.

Authors:  Harry Fisch; Stephen R Braun
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  The silent spermatozoon: are man-made endocrine disruptors killing male fertility?

Authors:  Bradley D Anawalt
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  The Disappearing Sperms: Analysis of Reports Published Between 1980 and 2015.

Authors:  Pallav Sengupta; Sulagna Dutta; Elzbieta Krajewska-Kulak
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-04-19

Review 6.  Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality.

Authors:  Jacques Auger; Florence Eustache; Cécile Chevrier; Bernard Jégou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 16.430

7.  Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France.

Authors:  M Rolland; J Le Moal; V Wagner; D Royère; J De Mouzon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  The effects of advanced paternal age on fertility.

Authors:  Jason R Kovac; Josephine Addai; Ryan P Smith; Robert M Coward; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Secular trends in semen parameters among men attending a fertility center between 2000 and 2017: Identifying potential predictors.

Authors:  Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Paige L Williams; Yu-Han Chiu; Audrey J Gaskins; Feiby L Nassan; Ramace Dadd; John Petrozza; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 10.  Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility.

Authors:  Niels E Skakkebaek; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Germaine M Buck Louis; Jorma Toppari; Anna-Maria Andersson; Michael L Eisenberg; Tina Kold Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Shanna H Swan; Katherine J Sapra; Søren Ziebe; Lærke Priskorn; Anders Juul
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.