Literature DB >> 9193059

Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa.

R W Chan1, I R Titze, M R Titze.   

Abstract

This paper reports results of further experimentation on a previously developed physical model of the vocal-fold mucosa [Titze et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3080-3084 (1995)]. The effects of vocal-fold thickness, epithelial membrane thickness, and prephonatory glottal geometry on phonation threshold pressure were studied. Phonation threshold pressures in the range of 0.13 to 0.34 kPa were observed for an 11-mm-thick vocal fold with a 70-micron-thick "epithelial" membrane for different "mucosal" fluid viscosities. Higher threshold pressure was always obtained for thinner vocal folds and thicker membranes. In another set of experiments, lowest offset threshold pressure was obtained for a rectangular or a near-rectangular prephonatory glottis (with a glottal convergence angle within about +/- 3 degrees). It ranged from 0.07 to 0.23 kPa for different glottal half-widths between 2.0 and 6.0 mm. The threshold for more convergent or divergent glottal geometries was consistently higher. This finding only partially agrees with previous analytical work which predicts a lowest threshold for a divergent glottis. The discrepancy between theory and data is likely to be associated with flow separation from a divergent glottis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193059     DOI: 10.1121/1.418331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Phonation threshold pressure and onset frequency in a two-layer physical model of the vocal folds.

Authors:  Abie H Mendelsohn; Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dependence of phonation threshold pressure and frequency on vocal fold geometry and biomechanics.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Quantitative Evaluation of the In Vivo Vocal Fold Medial Surface Shape.

Authors:  Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Zhaoyan Zhang; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Frequency response of synthetic vocal fold models with linear and nonlinear material properties.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shaw; Scott L Thomson; Christopher Dromey; Simeon Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Laryngeal and aerodynamic adjustments for voicing versus devoicing of /h/: a within-speaker study.

Authors:  Laura L Koenig; Jorge C Lucero; W Einar Mencl
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Influence of flow separation location on phonation onset.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Characteristics of phonation onset in a two-layer vocal fold model.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of inferior surface angle on the self-oscillation of a computational vocal fold model.

Authors:  Simeon L Smith; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A lumped mucosal wave model of the vocal folds revisited: recent extensions and oscillation hysteresis.

Authors:  Jorge C Lucero; Laura L Koenig; Kelem G Lourenço; Nicolas Ruty; Xavier Pelorson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of implant stiffness, shape, and medialization depth on the acoustic outcomes of medialization laryngoplasty.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang; Dinesh K Chhetri; Jennifer L Bergeron
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.