Literature DB >> 9193019

Gender-specific differences in the QT interval and the effect of autonomic tone and menstrual cycle in healthy adults.

J H Burke1, F A Ehlert, J T Kruse, M A Parker, J J Goldberger, A H Kadish.   

Abstract

Gender differences in the corrected QT interval have been noted since Bazett's initial description during the 1920s. The mechanism of this gender difference is unknown, and this study was undertaken to evaluate potential autonomic and menstrual cycle effects on the QT interval. The study population consisted of a healthy volunteer sample of 23 women and 20 men. Twelve-lead electrocardiographic determinations were made at rest and following double autonomic blockade (with atropine and propranolol) during the menstrual, follicular, and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Men were studied during 3 separate visits as controls. The corrected QT interval at baseline tended to be longer in women than men (421 +/- 16 ms vs 414 +/- 15 ms: p <0.07). Following double autonomic blockade, the corrected QT interval increased to 439 +/- 11 ms: p <0.001). However, the gender difference in corrected QT interval was unchanged (443 +/- 15 ms vs 437 +/- 12 ms). At baseline, there was no significant difference in the corrected QT interval among the 3 phases of the menstrual cycle (421 +/- 10, 423 +/- 18, and 420 +/- 18 in the menstrual, follicular, and luteal phases, respectively) and the corrected QT interval was longer in women than men at each visit. Following double autonomic blockade, the corrected QT interval in women was shorter in the luteal phase (438 +/- 16 ms) versus the menstrual (446 +/- 15 ms) or the follicular phase (444 +/- 13 ms; p <0.05). However, this difference, which was not present at baseline, does not appear to be responsible for the gender difference in the QT interval at rest. In conclusion, our results confirm that the corrected QT interval tends to be longer in women than men. Differences in autonomic tone and menstrual cycle variability in the corrected QT in women at rest do not appear to be responsible for the gender differences in the QT interval. The mechanism responsible for the longer QT interval in women remains to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193019     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00707-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  40 in total

Review 1.  Sex hormones and the QT interval: a review.

Authors:  Tara Sedlak; Chrisandra Shufelt; Carlos Iribarren; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Estradiol regulates human QT-interval: acceleration of cardiac repolarization by enhanced KCNH2 membrane trafficking.

Authors:  Lars Anneken; Stefan Baumann; Patrick Vigneault; Peter Biliczki; Corinna Friedrich; Ling Xiao; Zenawit Girmatsion; Ina Takac; Ralf P Brandes; Stefan Kissler; Inka Wiegratz; Sven Zumhagen; Birgit Stallmeyer; Stefan H Hohnloser; Thomas Klingenheben; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Stanley Nattel; Joachim R Ehrlich
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Sex hormones and arrhythmia in myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  T Korte; C Grohé
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Quizartinib, an FLT3 inhibitor, as monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Alexander E Perl; Hartmut Döhner; Hagop Kantarjian; Giovanni Martinelli; Tibor Kovacsovics; Philippe Rousselot; Björn Steffen; Hervé Dombret; Elihu Estey; Stephen Strickland; Jessica K Altman; Claudia D Baldus; Alan Burnett; Alwin Krämer; Nigel Russell; Neil P Shah; Catherine C Smith; Eunice S Wang; Norbert Ifrah; Guy Gammon; Denise Trone; Deborah Lazzaretto; Mark Levis
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Male and female equality: still far from goal.

Authors:  Liliana Sintra Grilo; Hugues Abriel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  The thorough QT/QTc study 4 years after the implementation of the ICH E14 guidance.

Authors:  Borje Darpo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Estrogen and progestin use and the QT interval in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Alan H Kadish; Philip Greenland; Marian C Limacher; William H Frishman; Sandra A Daugherty; Janice B Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Differences between ventricular repolarization in men and women: description, mechanism and implications.

Authors:  Borys Surawicz; Sanjay R Parikh
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Cardiac autonomic modulation by estrogen in female mice undergoing ambulatory monitoring and in vivo electrophysiologic testing.

Authors:  Samir Saba; Vladimir Shusterman; Irmute Usiene; Barry London
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  Estrogen contributes to gender differences in mouse ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  Tomoaki Saito; Andrea Ciobotaru; Jean Chrisostome Bopassa; Ligia Toro; Enrico Stefani; Mansoureh Eghbali
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.