RATIONALE: Fast-transient outward K(+) (I(to,f)) and ultrarapid delayed rectifier K(+) currents (I(K,slow), also known as I(Kur)) contribute to mouse cardiac repolarization. Gender studies on these currents have reported conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: Key missing information in these studies is the estral stage of the animals. We revisited gender-related differences in K(+) currents, taking into consideration the females' estral stage. We hypothesized that changes in estrogen levels during the estral cycle could play a role in determining the densities of K(+) currents underlying ventricular repolarization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peak total K(+) current (I(K,total)) densities (pA/pF, at +40 mV) were much higher in males (48.6+/-3.0) versus females at estrus (27.2+/-2.3) but not at diestrus-2 (39.1+/-3.4). Underlying this change, I(to,f) and I(K,slow) were lower in females at estrus versus males and diestrus-2 (I(K,slow): male 21.9+/-1.8, estrus 14.6+/-0.6, diestrus-2 20.3+/-1.4; I(to,f): male 26.8+/-1.9, estrus 14.9+/-1.6, diestrus-2 22.1+/-2.1). Lower I(K,slow) in estrus was attributable to only I(K,slow)(1) reduction, without changes in I(K,slow)(2). Estrogen treatment of ovariectomized mice decreased I(K,total) (46.4+/-3.0 to 28.4+/-1.6), I(to,f) (26.6+/-1.6 to 12.8+/-1.0) and I(K,slow) (22.2+/-1.6 to 17.2+/-1.4). Transcript levels of Kv4.3 and Kv1.5 (underlying I(to,f) and I(K,slow), respectively) were lower in estrus versus diestrus-2 and male. In ovariectomized mice, estrogen treatment resulted in downregulation of Kv4.3 and Kv1.5 but not Kv4.2, KChIP2, or Kv2.1 transcripts. K(+) current reduction in high estrogenic conditions were associated with prolongation of the action potential duration and corrected QT interval. CONCLUSION: Downregulation of Kv4.3 and Kv1.5 transcripts by estrogen are one mechanism defining gender-related differences in mouse ventricular repolarization.
RATIONALE: Fast-transient outward K(+) (I(to,f)) and ultrarapid delayed rectifier K(+) currents (I(K,slow), also known as I(Kur)) contribute to mouse cardiac repolarization. Gender studies on these currents have reported conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: Key missing information in these studies is the estral stage of the animals. We revisited gender-related differences in K(+) currents, taking into consideration the females' estral stage. We hypothesized that changes in estrogen levels during the estral cycle could play a role in determining the densities of K(+) currents underlying ventricular repolarization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peak total K(+) current (I(K,total)) densities (pA/pF, at +40 mV) were much higher in males (48.6+/-3.0) versus females at estrus (27.2+/-2.3) but not at diestrus-2 (39.1+/-3.4). Underlying this change, I(to,f) and I(K,slow) were lower in females at estrus versus males and diestrus-2 (I(K,slow): male 21.9+/-1.8, estrus 14.6+/-0.6, diestrus-2 20.3+/-1.4; I(to,f): male 26.8+/-1.9, estrus 14.9+/-1.6, diestrus-2 22.1+/-2.1). Lower I(K,slow) in estrus was attributable to only I(K,slow)(1) reduction, without changes in I(K,slow)(2). Estrogen treatment of ovariectomized mice decreased I(K,total) (46.4+/-3.0 to 28.4+/-1.6), I(to,f) (26.6+/-1.6 to 12.8+/-1.0) and I(K,slow) (22.2+/-1.6 to 17.2+/-1.4). Transcript levels of Kv4.3 and Kv1.5 (underlying I(to,f) and I(K,slow), respectively) were lower in estrus versus diestrus-2 and male. In ovariectomized mice, estrogen treatment resulted in downregulation of Kv4.3 and Kv1.5 but not Kv4.2, KChIP2, or Kv2.1 transcripts. K(+) current reduction in high estrogenic conditions were associated with prolongation of the action potential duration and corrected QT interval. CONCLUSION: Downregulation of Kv4.3 and Kv1.5 transcripts by estrogen are one mechanism defining gender-related differences in mouse ventricular repolarization.
Authors: A Yildirir; F Aybar; M G Kabakci; H Yarali; E Akgul; O Bukulmez; S L Tokgozoglu; T Gurgan; A Oto Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: S Nilsson; S Mäkelä; E Treuter; M Tujague; J Thomsen; G Andersson; E Enmark; K Pettersson; M Warner; J A Gustafsson Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; Mary S Anthony; Wayne E Cascio; Aaron R Folsom; Pentti M Rautaharju; Duanping Liao; Gregory W Evans; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Yun Ju Chae; Dae Hun Kim; Hong Joon Lee; Ki-Wug Sung; Oh-Joo Kwon; Sang June Hahn Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Andrea L Portbury; Sarah M Ronnebaum; Makhosazane Zungu; Cam Patterson; Monte S Willis Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Tara Sedlak; Chrisandra Shufelt; Carlos Iribarren; Liisa L Lyon; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Marius Heitzer; Sarah Kaiser; Mithila Kanagaratnam; Adib Zendedel; Philipp Hartmann; Cordian Beyer; Sonja Johann Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 5.590