Literature DB >> 9191827

Prevalence of hepatitis G virus RNA in French blood donors and recipients.

P Loiseau1, M Mariotti, C Corbi, N Ravera, R Girot, M Thauvin, E Portelette, X Mariette, F Roudot-Thoraval, M Benbunan, J J Lefrère.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, cases of chronic hepatitis were linked to the presence of genomic sequences of a newly described RNA virus termed hepatitis G virus (HGV) and belonging to the Flaviviridae family. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The presence of HGV RNA was searched for by polymerase chain reaction in a population of blood donors and in patients who had received multiple blood component transfusions and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusions.
RESULTS: Twenty-one (4.2%) of 500 donors were positive for HGV RNA as were 21 (10.7%) of 196 nonimmunosuppressed patients who had received multiple transfusions of packed red cells, 4 (8.7%) of 46 common variable immune deficiency (CVID) patients who had received only IVIG, and 22 (24.7%) of 89 bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients who had received IVIG and cellular components. The proportion of HGV-positive individuals was significantly higher in the immunosuppressed recipients (CVID and BMT patients) than in the nonimmunosuppressed patients who were multiply transfused with packed red cells (p < 0.03). The proportion of HGV-positive individuals was significantly higher in the BMT patients who had received IVIG and cellular components than in the CVID patients who had received IVIG only (p < 0.03). Eight (17.0%) of the 47 HGV-positive recipients and 48 (16.9%) of the 284 HGV-negative recipients had a serum alanine aminotransferase level higher than the upper limit of normal (nonsignificant difference). The medical history of HGV-positive donors failed to reveal a particular at-risk event. The large majority of HGV-infected patients had a normal serum alanine aminotransferase level, and the proportion of patients with elevated alanine aminotransferase was the same in HGV-positive and in HGV-negative recipients.
CONCLUSION: The pathological significance of HGV infection remains unelucidated, and the classification of HGV as a new hepatitis virus was perhaps premature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9191827     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37697335161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of GB virus C (also called hepatitis G virus) markers in Norwegian blood donors.

Authors:  S A Nordbø; S Krokstad; P Winge; F E Skjeldestad; A B Dalen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Transmission of GB virus type C via transfusion in a cohort of HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Farnaz Vahidnia; M Petersen; G Rutherford; M Busch; S Assmann; J T Stapleton; B Custer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  GEMHEP multicenter quality control study of PCR detection of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus RNA in serum.

Authors:  M Bogard; C Buffet-Janvresse; J F Cantaloube; P Biagini; G Duverlie; S Castelain; J Izopet; M Dubois; C Defer; I Lepot; J Coste; P Marcellin; M Martinot-Peignoux; P Halfon; V Gerolami; L Frangeul; J M Pawlotsky; F Roudot-Thoraval; E Dussaix; P Loiseau; N Ravera; P Lewin; J Lamoril; J Lerable; P Lebon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Emerging infectious threats to the blood supply: seroepidemiological studies in iran - a review.

Authors:  Gharib Karimi; Ahmad Gharehbaghian; Mohammad Fallah Tafti; Vida Vafaiyan
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  A general change of the platelet transfusion policy from apheresis platelet concentrates to pooled platelet concentrates is associated with a sharp increase in donor exposure and infection rates.

Authors:  Hans-Gert Heuft; Wolfgang Mende; Rainer Blasczyk
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.747

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.