Literature DB >> 9191589

A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization.

B Yvert1, O Bertrand, M Thévenet, J F Echallier, J Pernier.   

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the intrinsic localization error bias due to the use of a spherical geometry model on EEG simulated data obtained from realistically shaped models. About 2000 dipoles were randomly chosen on the segmented cortex surface of a particular subject. Forward calculations were performed using a uniformly meshed model for each dipole located at a depth greater than 20 mm below the brain surface, and locally refined models were used for shallower dipoles. Inverse calculations were performed using four different spherical models and another uniformly meshed model. It was found that the best spherical model lead to localization errors of 5-6 mm in the upper part of the head, and of 15-25 mm in the lower part. The influence of the number of electrodes upon this intrinsic bias was also studied. It was found that using 32 electrodes instead of 19 improves the localization by 2.7 mm on average, while using 63 instead of 32 electrodes lead to improvements of less than 1 mm. Finally, simulations involving two simultaneously active dipoles (one in the vicinity of each auditory cortex) show localization errors increasing by about 2-3 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9191589     DOI: 10.1016/s0921-884x(97)96611-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  15 in total

1.  Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.

Authors:  B Vanrumste; G Van Hoey; R Van de Walle; M D'Havé; I Lemahieu; P Boon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement.

Authors:  B Pleger; H R Dinse; P Ragert; P Schwenkreis; J P Malin; M Tegenthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mismatch negativity with visual-only and audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Curtis W Ponton; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Cortical representation of the human hand assessed by two levels of high-resolution EEG recordings.

Authors:  Bérengère Houzé; Caroline Perchet; Michel Magnin; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model.

Authors:  Gabriela Scheler; Michael J M Fischer; Alexandra Genow; Cornelia Hummel; Stefan Rampp; Andrea Paulini; Rüdiger Hopfengärtner; Martin Kaltenhäuser; Hermann Stefan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Dipole source analyses of early median nerve SEP components obtained from subdural grid recordings.

Authors:  Ulf Baumgärtner; Hagen Vogel; Shinji Ohara; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Fred A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A robust current pattern for the detection of intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates using electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  T Tang; Sungho Oh; R J Sadleir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Realistic and spherical head modeling for EEG forward problem solution: a comparative cortex-based analysis.

Authors:  Federica Vatta; Fabio Meneghini; Fabrizio Esposito; Stefano Mininel; Francesco Di Salle
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-14

9.  Utility of independent component analysis for interpretation of intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Diane Whitmer; Gregory Worrell; Matt Stead; Il Keun Lee; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model.

Authors:  Nicolas Chauveau; Xavier Franceries; Bernard Doyon; Bernard Rigaud; Jean Pierre Morucci; Pierre Celsis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.