Literature DB >> 9189863

Critical role of the extracorporeal blood temperature in the hemodynamic response during hemofiltration.

W H van Kuijk1, D Hillion, C Savoiu, K M Leunissen.   

Abstract

Impaired vascular reactivity during combined ultrafiltration-hemodialysis (UF+HD) compared with hemofiltration (HF) remains a rather enigmatic problem, the causes of which are still not well understood. Although a number of factors have been claimed to be responsible, most recent studies point to a major role of the extracorporeal blood temperature, which is usually lower during HF compared with UF + HD. However, previous studies in which hemodynamics were studied during UF + HD and HF in relation to the extracorporeal blood temperature are limited by the use of acetate in UF + HD, and measurements were often confined to BP and heart rate. Therefore, arterial BP, as well as forearm vascular resistance (FVR) and venous tone (strain-gauge plethysmography), was measured in 11 hemodialysis patients during 3 h UF + HD (37.5 degrees C) and predilution HF (39.0 degrees C = warm HF), resulting in equivalent extracorporeal blood temperatures. Patients were also studied during cold HF at an infusate temperature of 36.0 degrees C. UF + HD and HF were matched with respect to the dialysate and infusate composition (bicarbonate), bio-compatibility factors, and small molecule clearance. At equivalent temperatures, UF + HD and HF were associated with a comparable vascular and BP response. Only cold HF was associated with a significant increase in FVR. In addition, FVR and venous tone, as well as arterial BP, were all significantly higher during cold HF compared with both UF + HD and warm HF. These results indicate that the disparity in vascular reactivity between UF + HD and HF is primarily related to differences in the extracorporeal blood temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9189863     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V86949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  5 in total

1.  Does increased removal of high-molecular-weight toxins improve the survival of hemodialysis patients?

Authors:  Richard A Ward
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-11

Review 2.  Intradialytic Hypotension: Mechanisms and Outcome.

Authors:  Benedict Sars; Frank M van der Sande; Jeroen P Kooman
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 3.  Effect of Lowering the Dialysate Temperature in Chronic Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Reem A Mustafa; Fadi Bdair; Elie A Akl; Amit X Garg; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Hassan Salameh; Sood Kisra; Gihad Nesrallah; Ahmad Al-Jaishi; Parth Patel; Payal Patel; Ahmad A Mustafa; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Control of core temperature and blood pressure stability during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Frank M van der Sande; Grzegorz Wystrychowski; Jeroen P Kooman; Laura Rosales; Jochen Raimann; Peter Kotanko; Mary Carter; Christopher T Chan; Karel M L Leunissen; Nathan W Levin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Benefits of an early cooling phase in continuous renal replacement therapy for ICU patients.

Authors:  René Robert; Jean-Eudes Méhaud; Najette Timricht; Véronique Goudet; Olivier Mimoz; Bertrand Debaene
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 6.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.