Literature DB >> 19002134

Does increased removal of high-molecular-weight toxins improve the survival of hemodialysis patients?

Richard A Ward1.   

Abstract

This commentary discusses a small multicenter, prospective clinical trial in which patients with end-stage renal disease were randomized to treatment with online high-flux hemofiltration or low-flux hemodialysis. Over a 3-year follow-up period, survival was significantly better in patients who received online hemofiltration than in patients who received low-flux hemodialysis. In addition, the average duration, but not the frequency, of hospitalization, and the incidence of intradialytic hypotension, were lower in the hemofiltration group than in the hemodialysis group. The study supports the hypothesis that increased removal of large molecules can decrease the high morbidity and mortality associated with end-stage renal disease. However, the applicability of the findings to the general population of patients with end-stage renal disease might be limited by the small size of the study, the demographics of the study population, and the high dropout rate. Larger trials are needed to confirm this study's results and to establish the appropriate dose of convection for optimal outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002134     DOI: 10.1038/ncpneph1002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Nephrol        ISSN: 1745-8323


  5 in total

1.  Critical role of the extracorporeal blood temperature in the hemodynamic response during hemofiltration.

Authors:  W H van Kuijk; D Hillion; C Savoiu; K M Leunissen
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS.

Authors:  B Canaud; J L Bragg-Gresham; M R Marshall; S Desmeules; B W Gillespie; T Depner; P Klassen; F K Port
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Associations of hemodialysis dose and session length with mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand patients.

Authors:  M R Marshall; B G Byrne; P G Kerr; S P McDonald
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Garabed Eknoyan; Gerald J Beck; Alfred K Cheung; John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Michael Allon; James Bailey; James A Delmez; Thomas A Depner; Johanna T Dwyer; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; Edgar Milford; Daniel B Ornt; Michael V Rocco; Gerald Schulman; Steve J Schwab; Brendan P Teehan; Robert Toto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The effect of on-line high-flux hemofiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis on mortality in chronic kidney failure: a small randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antonio Santoro; Elena Mancini; Roberto Bolzani; Rolando Boggi; Leonardo Cagnoli; Angelo Francioso; Maurizio Fusaroli; Valter Piazza; Renato Rapanà; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 8.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.