Literature DB >> 9189733

Specificity of resistance training responses in neck muscle size and strength.

M S Conley1, M H Stone, M Nimmons, G A Dudley.   

Abstract

This study examined hypertrophy after head extension resistance training to assess which muscles of the complicated cervical neuromuscular system were used in this activity. We also determined if conventional resistance exercises, which are likely to evoke isometric action of the neck, induce generalized hypertrophy of the cervical muscle. Twenty-two active college students were studied. [mean (SE) age, weight and height: 21 (1) years, 71 (4) kg and 173 (3) cm, respectively]. Subjects were assigned to one of three groups: RESX (head extension exercise and other resistance exercises), RES (resistance exercises without specific neck exercise), or CON (no training). Groups RESX (n = 8) and RES (n = 6) trained 3 days/week for 12 weeks with large-muscle mass exercises (squat, deadlift, push press, bent row and mid-thigh pull). Group RESX also performed three sets of ten repetitions of a head extension exercise 3 days/week with a load equal to the 3 x 10 repetition maximum (RM). Group CON (n = 8) was a control group. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of nine individual muscles or muscle groups was determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical region. The CSA data were averaged over four contiguous transaxial slices in which all muscles of interest were visible. The 3 x 10 RM for the head extension exercise increased for RESX after training [from 17.9 (1.0) to 23.9 (1.4) kg, P < 0.05] but not for RES [from 17.6 (1.4) to 17.7 (1.9) kg] or CON [from 10.1 (2.2) to 10.3 (2.1) kg]. RESX showed an increase in total neck muscle CSA after training [from 19.5 (3.0) to 22.0 (3.6) cm2, P < 0.05], but RES and CON did not [from 19.6 (2.9) to 19.7 (2.9) cm2 and 17.0 (2.5) to 17.0 (2.4) cm2, respectively]. This hypertrophy for RESX was due mainly to increases in CSA of 23.9 (3.2), 24.0 (5.8), and 24.9 (5.3)% for the splenius capitis, and semispinalis capitis and cervicis muscles, respectively. The lack of generalized neck muscle hypertrophy in RES was not due to insufficient training. For example, the CSA of their quadriceps femoris muscle group, as assessed by MRI, increased by 7 (1)% after this short-term training (P < 0.05). The results suggest that: (1) the splenius capitis, and semispinalis capitis and cervicis muscles are mainly responsible for head extension; (2) short-term resistance training does not provide a sufficient stimulus to evoke neck muscle hypertrophy unless specific neck exercises are performed; and (3) the postural role of head extensors provides modest loading in bipeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9189733     DOI: 10.1007/s004210050186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  11 in total

1.  Can a Specific Neck Strengthening Program Decrease Cervical Spine Injuries in a Men's Professional Rugby Union Team? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Naish; Angus Burnett; Sally Burrows; Warren Andrews; Brendyn Appleby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Neck Muscular Strength, Training, Performance and Sport Injury Risk: A Review.

Authors:  Con Hrysomallis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Caina Lin; Cuicui Liu; Songjian Ke; Qing Wan; Haijie Luo; Zhuxi Huang; Wenjun Xin; Chao Ma; Shaoling Wu
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Retest reliability of force-time variables of neck muscles under isometric conditions.

Authors:  Sivan Almosnino; Lucie Pelland; Joan M Stevenson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Cervical musculoskeletal impairments and temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Susan Armijo-Olivo; David Magee
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Limitation of activities of daily living accompanying reduced neck mobility after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis into axis.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Atsushi Ono; Takuya Numasawa; Kanichiro Wada; Taito Itabashi; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Developmental biomechanics of neck musculature.

Authors:  Amy V Lavallee; Randal P Ching; David J Nuckley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Baogan Peng; Liang Yang; Yongchao Li; Tanghua Liu; Yanqing Liu
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-01-12

9.  Electrically Stimulated Antagonist Muscle Contraction Increased Muscle Mass and Bone Mineral Density of One Astronaut - Initial Verification on the International Space Station.

Authors:  Naoto Shiba; Hiroo Matsuse; Yoshio Takano; Kazuhiro Yoshimitsu; Masayuki Omoto; Ryuki Hashida; Yoshihiko Tagawa; Tomohisa Inada; Shin Yamada; Hiroshi Ohshima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Axial Symptoms and Limitations of Activities of Daily Living Accompanying Reduced Neck Mobility After Cervical Laminoplasty Preserving C2 Muscle Attachments With and Without C2 to T1 Instrumented Fusion.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.