Literature DB >> 18038160

Limitation of activities of daily living accompanying reduced neck mobility after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis into axis.

Kazunari Takeuchi1, Toru Yokoyama2, Atsushi Ono2, Takuya Numasawa2, Kanichiro Wada2, Taito Itabashi2, Satoshi Toh2.   

Abstract

Although difficulties with neck mobility often interfere with patients' activities of daily living (ADL) after cervical laminoplasty, there was no detailed study on the relation between the limitations of ADL accompanying postoperative reduced neck mobility and the cervical posterior approach. The aim of this study was to compare retrospectively the frequency of limitations of ADL accompanying neck mobility after laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into the C2 spinous process with that after laminoplasty reattaching the muscle to C2. Forty-nine patients after C4-C7 laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into C2 (Group A) and 24 patients after C3-C7 laminoplasty reattaching the muscle (Group B) were evaluated. The frequency of postoperative limitations of ADL accompanying each of three neck movements of extension, flexion and rotation were investigated. The postoperative O-C7 angles at extension and flexion was measured on lateral extension and flexion radiographs of the cervical spine, respectively. The postoperative cervical range of motion in rotation was measured in the cranial view using a digital camera. Frequency of limitations of ADL accompanying extension was lower (P = 0.037) in Group A (2%) than in Group B (17%). Frequency of limitations of ADL accompanying flexion was similar in Group A (8%) and Group B (4%). Frequency of limitations of ADL accompanying rotation was lower (P = 0.031) in Group A (12%) than in Group B (33%). Average O-C7 angle at extension was significantly larger (P = 0.002) in Group A (147 degrees ) than in Group B (136 degrees ). Average O-C7 angle at flexion was similar in Group A (93 degrees ) and Group B (91 degrees ). Average range of motion in rotation was significantly larger (P = 0.004) in Group A (110 degrees ) than in Group B (91 degrees ). This retrospective study suggested that the frequency of limitations of ADL accompanying neck extension or rotation was lower after laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into C2 than after laminoplasty reattaching the muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038160      PMCID: PMC2270385          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0553-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  A Seichi; K Takeshita; I Ohishi; H Kawaguchi; T Akune; Y Anamizu; T Kitagawa; K Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  H Iizuka; T Shimizu; K Tateno; N Toda; H Edakuni; H Shimada; K Takagishi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: a modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Shuichi Aburakawa; Akira Saito; Takuya Numasawa; Tetsuya Iwasaki; Taito Itabashi; Akihiro Okada; Junji Ito; Kazumasa Ueyama; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Cervical curvature after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy--involvement of yellow ligament, semispinalis cervicis muscle, and nuchal ligament.

Authors:  K Sasai; T Saito; S Akagi; I Kato; R Ogawa
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-02

5.  Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years.

Authors:  E Wada; S Suzuki; A Kanazawa; T Matsuoka; S Miyamoto; K Yonenobu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up.

Authors:  Motoki Iwasaki; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Tomoatsu Kimura; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty?

Authors:  Munehito Yoshida; Tetsuya Tamaki; Mamoru Kawakami; Naoki Nakatani; Muneharu Ando; Hiroshi Yamada; Nobuhiro Hayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Hiroaki Nakamura; Sadahiko Konishi; Ryuichi Nagayama; Eisuke Suzuki; Yoshiki Yamano; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Masahiko Kanamori; Hirokazu Ishihara; Kazuo Ohmori; Hiroshi Nakamura; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Morio Matsumoto; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Masahiko Watanabe; Kiyoshi Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Kimura; Atsushi Seichi; Hirokazu Inoue; Yuichi Hoshino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of Axial Symptoms and Limitations of Activities of Daily Living Accompanying Reduced Neck Mobility After Cervical Laminoplasty Preserving C2 Muscle Attachments With and Without C2 to T1 Instrumented Fusion.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-07-05

4.  Fixed Neck Position in Multilevel Cervical Posterior Decompression and Fusion to Reduce Postoperative Disturbances of Cervical Spine Function.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Kan-Ichiro Wada; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo; Seiya Ota
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-04-27

5.  Cervical rotation before and after hinge-door cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Sachin A Borkar; Ravi Sreenivasan; Ravi Sharma; Sumit Sinha; S Leve Joseph; Ajay Garg; Shashank Sharad Kale
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Severe C8 or T1 Symptoms after Cervical Laminoplasty and Related Factors: Are Tere Any Differences between C3-C6 Laminoplasty and C3-C7 Laminoplasty?

Authors:  Hitoshi Kudo; Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Kanichiro Wada; Gentaro Kumagai; Toru Asari; Hironori Otsuka; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-03-15

7.  The Midterm Surgical Outcome of Modified Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ru-Ping Lee; Ing-Ho Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Is laminoplasty or laminectomy the best strategy for C3 segment in French-door laminoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiantian Chen; Xun Zhang; Fanchao Meng; Jinglong Yan; Gongping Xu; Wei Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.