Literature DB >> 9188967

Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers.

E Sauget1, D A Covell, R P Boero, W S Lieber.   

Abstract

Following orthodontic treatment, an increase in the number of occlusal contacts is usually desired during retention. In this study, Hawley and clear overlay orthodontic retainers were compared relative to changes in the number of occlusal contacts. Occlusal contacts were quantified in 30 orthodontic patients at debonding, at retainer delivery, and after 3 months of retention. The paired t-test was applied to evaluate longitudinal changes in the number of and intensity of contacts. Results show that with the Hawley retainer there was a significant increase in occlusal contacts on posterior teeth and no change on anterior teeth. With the clear overlay retainer there was no significant change in either posterior or anterior contacts during retention. The retentive capacities of the two retainers differ: the Hawley retainer allows relative vertical movement (settling) of the posterior teeth while the clear overlay retainer holds teeth in their debanding position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9188967     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0223:COOCWU>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention.

Authors:  S Kotecha; S Gale; L Khamashta-Ledezma; J Scott; M Seedat; M Storey; A Ulhaq; J Scholey
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Retention in orthodontics.

Authors:  C D Johnston; S J Littlewood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success.

Authors:  Nikolay D Mollov; Steven J Lindauer; Al M Best; Bhavna Shroff; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bauer; Rolf Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of a new type of clear overlay retainer on occlusal contacts.

Authors:  Kyoung Yeon Kim; Hyo-Won Ahn; Seong-Hun Kim; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Authors:  Simon J Littlewood; Declan T Millett; Bridget Doubleday; David R Bearn; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

7.  Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers.

Authors:  Abdullah Demir; Hasan Babacan; Ruhi Nalcacı; Tolga Topcuoglu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 8.  The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dalya Al-Moghrabi; Nikolaos Pandis; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols.

Authors:  Baratali Ramazanzadeh; Farzaneh Ahrari; Zahra-Sadat Hosseini
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-03-01

10.  Thermoformed Retainer: An Effective Option for Long-Term Stability.

Authors:  A Giancotti; P Mozzicato; G Mampieri
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-10-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.