Literature DB >> 9188748

A conserved cluster of homeodomain binding sites in the mouse Hoxa-4 intron functions in Drosophila embryos as an enhancer that is directly regulated by Ultrabithorax.

T E Haerry1, W J Gehring.   

Abstract

The evolutionary conservation of the homeodomains suggests that their in vivo DNA binding sites may also be conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates. The regulatory function of the mouse Hoxa-4 and Hoxb-4 introns were analyzed in Drosophila since they both contain a cluster of three homeodomain binding sites, the HB1 element, which was also found in the introns of other Hox genes ranging from fish to humans as well as in the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and decapentaplegic (dpp) genes of Drosophila. The enhancer of the Hoxa-4 intron was found to respond to several homeobox genes activating a lacZ reporter gene in particular cells of the epidermis in Drosophila embryos. The enhancer activity was found to be similar to previously described autoregulatory elements of Deformed (Dfd), the Drosophila homolog of Hoxa-4, but additional expression was observed in more posterior segments activated by Ubx and repressed by abdominal-A (abd-A). Point mutations in the homeodomain binding sites in HB1 abolished the enhancer activity. A second site suppression experiment showed that UBX interacts directly with the HB1 element. When the HB1 element in the Hoxa-4 intron was replaced by that of the mesodermal enhancer of dpp, which was previously shown to be directly controlled by Ubx, Ubx-dependent activation was retained, but repression by abd-A was lost. The same result was obtained when the third binding site of HB1 was altered, suggesting that this site is responsible for abd-A-dependent repression. Finally, deletion of potential cofactor binding sites flanking the HB1 element that are also conserved in the medaka, chicken, and mouse genes revealed that they are important for enhancer function in Drosophila and that the Dfd-dependent and the Ubx-dependent expression requires different sites. The evolutionary and functional conservation of the HB1 elements indicates that not only the homeodomains but also some of their in vivo binding sites are conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9188748     DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  11 in total

1.  Regulation by homeoproteins: a comparison of deformed-responsive elements.

Authors:  J A Pederson; J W LaFollette; C Gross; A Veraksa; W McGinnis; J W Mahaffey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolutionary conservation of regulatory elements in vertebrate Hox gene clusters.

Authors:  Simona Santini; Jeffrey L Boore; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Modification of expression and cis-regulation of Hoxc8 in the evolution of diverged axial morphology.

Authors:  H G Belting; C S Shashikant; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hox cluster genomics in the horn shark, Heterodontus francisci.

Authors:  C B Kim; C Amemiya; W Bailey; K Kawasaki; J Mezey; W Miller; S Minoshima; N Shimizu; G Wagner; F Ruddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  RNA editing of the Drosophila para Na(+) channel transcript. Evolutionary conservation and developmental regulation.

Authors:  C J Hanrahan; M J Palladino; B Ganetzky; R A Reenan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Multigenome DNA sequence conservation identifies Hox cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Steven G Kuntz; Erich M Schwarz; John A DeModena; Tristan De Buysscher; Diane Trout; Hiroaki Shizuya; Paul W Sternberg; Barbara J Wold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Unexpectedly large number of conserved noncoding regions within the ancestral chordate Hox cluster.

Authors:  Juan Pascual-Anaya; Salvatore D'Aniello; Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 8.  Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators.

Authors:  Richard S Mann; Katherine M Lelli; Rohit Joshi
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Transactivation in Drosophila of human enhancers by human transcription factors involved in congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  Vincenzo Amodio; Maria Florencia Tevy; Concetta Traina; Tushar Kanti Ghosh; Maria Capovilla
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  Comparative analyses of vertebrate posterior HoxD clusters reveal atypical cluster architecture in the caecilian Typhlonectes natans.

Authors:  An Mannaert; Chris T Amemiya; Franky Bossuyt
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.