Literature DB >> 9186315

Long-term results of retropubic permanent 125iodine implantation of the prostate for clinically localized prostatic cancer.

M J Zelefsky1, W F Whitmore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The historical series of retropubic prostate radioactive source implantation from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center has served as the framework for the current transperineal implant approaches used in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer. We report the final assessment of the 15-year outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1970 and December 1987, 1,078 patients with biopsy proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated at our cancer center with permanent implantation of 125iodine via a retropubic approach. In addition, all patients underwent bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy before implantation. The clinical stages of disease were B1 in 234 patients (22%), B2 in 472 (44%), B3 in 145 (14%) and C in 227 (20%). Of the patients 733 (68%) had pathologically negative lymph nodes, whereas 345 (32%) had positive lymph nodes at lymph node dissection. Median followup was 11 years.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified nodal involvement, high grade disease, clinical stage B3/C and implant doses less than 140 Gy, as independent predictors of local relapse. Independent predictors of distant metastases included nodal involvement, stage B3/C disease and poorly differentiated histological status. The local recurrence-free survival rates for patients with negative nodes at 5, 10 and 15 years were 69, 44 and 24%, respectively. The distant metastases-free survival rates at 5, 10 and 15 years for patients with negative lymph nodes were 59, 36 and 21%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: 125Iodine implantation of the prostate via the retropubic approach was associated with a greater than expected incidence of local relapse at 15 years. Technical limitations of the retropubic technique resulting in suboptimal distribution of the isotope within the prostate are believed to be the explanation for the inferior local control outcome. Although long-term results are not yet available, the 5-year results of the computer optimized transperineal prostate implantation suggest that improved implant techniques will translate into a greater likelihood of tumor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9186315     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199707000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy: the significance of postimplant dosimetry.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

2.  A systematic evaluation of the dose-rate constant determined by photon spectrometry for 21 different models of low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy sources.

Authors:  Zhe Jay Chen; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tony Y Eng; Join Y Luh; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Prostate deformation from inflatable rectal probe cover and dosimetric effects in prostate seed implant brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jun Lian; Yeqin Shao; Larry D Potter; Ronald C Chen; Jordan A Holmes; Eleanor A Pryser; Jie Shen; Dinggang Shen; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Brachytherapy with permanent seed implantation.

Authors:  Shiro Saito; Hirohiko Nagata; Michio Kosugi; Kazuhito Toya; Atsunori Yorozu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  E A Klein; P A Kupelian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-12

Review 10.  Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a current review.

Authors:  Jeffrey Woolsey; Nicole Miller; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.