J L Riley1, M E Robinson. 1. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a rationally constructed pain coping assessment instrument, was conceived to measure the extent to which patients used six different cognitive coping strategies and two behavioral coping strategies. A number of studies have factor analyzed the original scales but have not found a reliable factor structure. Recent studies by Turtle et al. and Swartzman et al. have obtained a five-factor solution performing exploratory factor analysis on the individual items. Robinson and associates from the University of Florida performed an item level exploratory factor analysis on a much larger sample (n = 965) and found a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original rationally derived scales. The purpose of the present investigation was to perform a confirmatory factor analysis using the LISREL structural equation modeling program to compare these three different factor structures. PATIENTS: A sample of 472 chronic patients was used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the Florida six-factor model was a better fit to the sample data than either of the five-factor models. Creation of the Coping Strategy Questionnaire Revised (CSQ-R), which retains 27 of the original items, is suggested.
OBJECTIVE: The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a rationally constructed pain coping assessment instrument, was conceived to measure the extent to which patients used six different cognitive coping strategies and two behavioral coping strategies. A number of studies have factor analyzed the original scales but have not found a reliable factor structure. Recent studies by Turtle et al. and Swartzman et al. have obtained a five-factor solution performing exploratory factor analysis on the individual items. Robinson and associates from the University of Florida performed an item level exploratory factor analysis on a much larger sample (n = 965) and found a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original rationally derived scales. The purpose of the present investigation was to perform a confirmatory factor analysis using the LISREL structural equation modeling program to compare these three different factor structures. PATIENTS: A sample of 472 chronic patients was used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the Florida six-factor model was a better fit to the sample data than either of the five-factor models. Creation of the Coping Strategy Questionnaire Revised (CSQ-R), which retains 27 of the original items, is suggested.
Authors: Roger B Fillingim; Richard Ohrbach; Joel D Greenspan; Charles Knott; Ronald Dubner; Eric Bair; Cristina Baraian; Gary D Slade; William Maixner Journal: J Pain Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Kimberly T Sibille; Lindsay L Kindler; Toni L Glover; Roland Staud; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Kathryn A Thompson; Hailey W Bulls; Kimberly T Sibille; Emily J Bartley; Toni L Glover; Ellen L Terry; Ivana A Vaughn; Josue S Cardoso; Adriana Sotolongo; Roland Staud; Laura B Hughes; Jeffrey C Edberg; David T Redden; Laurence A Bradley; Burel R Goodin; Roger B Fillingim Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Christopher D King; Burel R Goodin; Kimberly T Sibille; Toni L Glover; Joseph L Riley; Adriana Sotolongo; Matthew S Herbert; Jessica Schmidt; Barri J Fessler; David T Redden; Roland Staud; Laurence A Bradley; Roger B Fillingim Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.794