Literature DB >> 10998723

The psychological assessment of patients with chronic pain.

A H Lebovits1.   

Abstract

This article reviews the objectives of psychological evaluations, as well as the standard pain center evaluation protocol that uses a pain questionnaire, a structured clinical interview, and pain assessment measures that include pain intensity rating scales and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The most frequently used measures of psychological status, such as the Beck Depression Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), are reviewed. Psychological predictors of invasive procedures and of disability are also outlined. The importance of listening to the patient in a multidisciplinary setting is emphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10998723     DOI: 10.1007/s11916-000-0045-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Pain        ISSN: 1069-5850


  15 in total

1.  Assessing depression among persons with chronic pain using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  M E Geisser; R S Roth; M E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  CSQ: five factors or fiction?

Authors:  J L Riley; M E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data.

Authors:  D C Turk; T E Rudy
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-04

5.  Chronic pain and depression: does the evidence support a relationship?

Authors:  J M Romano; J A Turner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; T G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The differential utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. A predictor of outcome in lumbar laminectomy for disc herniation versus spinal stenosis.

Authors:  L D Herron; J Turner; S Clancy; P Weiner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire reconsidered: confirming the factor structure and examining appropriate uses.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Thomas E Rudy; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc. Additional experience with an objective method.

Authors:  D M Spengler; E A Ouellette; M Battié; J Zeh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Psychiatric comorbidity in chronic daily headache: pathophysiology, etiology, and diagnosis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Guidetti; Federica Galli
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  The use of opioid analgesics for chronic pain: minimizing the risk for harm.

Authors:  Charles E Argoff; Eugene R Viscusi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  2014-09-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.