Literature DB >> 9184491

Characterizing the intuitive representation in problem solving: evidence from evaluating mathematical strategies.

J A Dixon1, C F Moore.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the nature of the intuitive problem representation used in evaluating mathematical strategies. The first experiment tested between two representations: a representation composed of principles and an integrated representation. Subjects judged the correctness of unseen math strategies based only on the answers they produced for a set of temperature mixture problems. The distance of the given answers from the correct answers and whether the answers violated one of the principles of temperature mixture were manipulated. The results supported the principle representation hypothesis. In the second experiment we manipulated subjects' understanding of an acid mixture task with a brief paragraph of instruction on one of the principles. Subjects then completed an estimation task intended to measure their understanding of the problem domain. The evaluation task from the first experiment was then presented, but with acid mixture instead of temperature mixture. The results showed that intuitive understanding of the domain mediates the effect of instruction on evaluating problems. Additionally, the results supported the hypothesis that subjects perform a mapping process between their intuitive understanding and math strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9184491     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems.

Authors:  J Larkin; J McDermott; D P Simon; H A Simon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-06-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cognitive arithmetic: comparison of operations.

Authors:  K Miller; M Perlmutter; D Keating
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among experts and novices.

Authors:  P T Hardiman; R Dufresne; J P Mestre
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-09

4.  Why 2 X 2 = 5 looks so wrong: on the odd-even rule in product verification.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

5.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems.

Authors:  W Kintsch; J G Greeno
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains.

Authors:  R S Siegler; K Crowley
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: on the odd-even rule in sum verification.

Authors:  L E Krueger; E W Hallford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-03

8.  Dependence, independence, and emergence of word features.

Authors:  G C Oden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A pattern recognition account of decision making.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09

10.  When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: the example of the odd-even effect on product verification.

Authors:  P Lemaire; M Fayol
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning.

Authors:  Magda Osman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

Review 2.  Development of intuitive rules: evaluating the application of the dual-system framework to understanding children's intuitive reasoning.

Authors:  Magda Osman; Ruth Stavy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

3.  The representations of the arithmetic operations include functional relationships.

Authors:  J A Dixon; J K Deets; A Bangert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.