[Value of various intra- and extraoral therapeutic procedures for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring].

BACKGROUND: Recently intra- and extraoral devices are increasingly used in order to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and snoring. We examined the value of some devices according to the literature and our own results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The mandibular advancing devices aim at increasing upper airway diameter. The active part of the tongue extending device (SnorEx) is a stamp connected to a piston which exerts pressure at the base of the tongue causing its forward displacement; we studied 23 patients. The principle of an optically stimulating system ("eye-cover", Snore-Stop) consists of a microphone and light diods which are integrated in the eye-cover. After detecting acoustic signals (for example snoring) optical stimuli are generated in front of the eyes, which are thought to induce arousals causing a change of body position and the reduction of the snoring and apneas; we measured 24 patients. The principle of the tongue-retainer (Snore-Master) is the fixation of the tongue in a ventral position, which is thought to enlarge the mesopharyngeal area; we studied 14 patients. The nose plaster (Breathe-Right) contains an elastic spine that pulls the alae nasi cranial. This manipulation is thought to increase the diameter of the nostril and reduce the airway resistance. We measured 30 patients with obstructive sleep apnea and 20 snoring subjects without obstructive sleep apnea.
RESULTS: Regarding the mandibular advancing due to different appliance designs and study protocols variable success rates have been documented. In patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea a reduction of the sleep related breathing disorder could be shown. Non compliance (NC) to the tongue extending device was 75% (17/23). Non-compliance-patients were characterized by unacceptable local-side-effects of the prosthesis, lacking improvement of symptoms and of the respiratory disturbance index. Both tongue-retainer and -extensor are characterized by a high incidence of local side effects. Neither the eye-cover nor the nose plaster could improve the severity of obstructive sleep apnoe or snoring. In contrast to another study we could not show a significant effect of the tongue-retainer.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither the nose plaster nor the optical stimulating device influenced the degree of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring. There are conflicting data regarding the tongue retainer. The high rate of non-compliant subjects and the low efficacy of the tongue extending prosthesis precludes large-scale use of this treatment modality in patients with obstructive sleep apnoe and snoring. In selected individuals suffering from a mild to moderate degree of obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP-inefficiency and -incompliance the mandibular advancing principle may be an therapeutic alternative to CPAP.