Literature DB >> 9171758

A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer.

B J Kjeldsen1, O Kronborg, C Fenger, O D Jørgensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The possible benefit for patients from follow-up examinations after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is unproven. The purpose of this study was to determine whether survival is improved by frequent follow-up examinations.
METHODS: A total of 597 patients less than 76 years old treated with radical surgery for colorectal cancer were included in the study from 1983 to 1994. Patients were randomized to frequent follow-up (group 1) or virtually no follow-up (group 2) with examinations at 5 and 10 years.
RESULTS: Group 1 comprised 290 patients, group 2 contained 307. Recurrence was equally frequent (26 per cent), but the time of diagnosis was 9 months earlier in group 1; also, more recurrences were asymptomatic in group 1 and more patients had new surgery with curative intent (P = 0.02). However, no improvement in overall survival or in cancer-related survival resulted.
CONCLUSION: Patients subjected to intensive follow-up have recurrence diagnosed earlier, and have more operations for recurrence, but the survival results suggest that any major improvement by intensive follow-up is unlikely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9171758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  69 in total

1.  Guidelines for follow up after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; R J Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Adena Scheer; Rebecca Ann C Auer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

3.  Intensive or not surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer after curative resection.

Authors:  Gerardo Rosati
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Surveillance of patients following surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven Gan; Katherine Wilson; Paul Hollington
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Immunomodulation in surgical practice.

Authors:  R Andersson; B Andersson; E Andersson; G Eckerwall; M Nordén; B Tingstedt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Systematic follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal cancer in Norway: a population-based audit of effectiveness, costs, and compliance.

Authors:  Hartwig Körner; Kjetil Söreide; Pål J Stokkeland; Jon Arne Söreide
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Kate D Cromwell; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.495

9.  Follow-up recommendations for colon cancer.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Jo-Anne P Attard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

10.  The role of postoperative surveillance in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kerry Hammond; David A Margolin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.