Literature DB >> 9171488

The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.

P P Binon1, M J McHugh.   

Abstract

External hexagonal implants of known dimensions were assembled with premachined cast abutments and rebroached cast abutments. The abutment screws were tightened to 20 Ncm and 30 Ncm, and the samples were loaded off axis with 133.3 N. Load application was at 1,150 cycles per minute with a sample counterclockwise rotation of 28 cycles per minute. The premachined cast abutments tightened to 20 Ncm failed with a mean of 357,162 cycles (SD = 77,981 cycles). The rebroached cast abutments were cycled to 1 million cycles without failure. At 30 Ncm, the premachined cast abutments failed at a mean of 5.0 million cycles (SD = 2.2 X 10(6) cycles). Two of five rebroached cast abutments failed at 4.3 million and 9.5 million cycles, but the remaining samples showed no evidence of screw loosening after 10 million cycles, at which time the test was terminated. The results indicate a direct correlation between rotational misfit and screw loosening. Screw joints can be made more resistive to screw loosening by the elimination of rotational misfit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9171488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  20 in total

1.  Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of cement washout on loosening of abutment screws and vice versa in screw- and cement- retained implant-supported dental prosthesis.

Authors:  Seok-Gyu Kim; Chae-Heon Chung; Mee-Kyoung Son
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  The change of rotational freedom following different insertion torques in three implant systems with implant driver.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Kwon; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim; Jae-Seung Chang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface.

Authors:  Fabio C Lorenzoni; Paulo G Coelho; Gerson Bonfante; Ricardo M Carvalho; Nelson R F A Silva; Marcelo Suzuki; Thelma Lopes Silva; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-07-02

5.  Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Chae; Young-Sung Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Won-Kyung Kim; Young-Kyoo Lee; Su-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants.

Authors:  Woong-Rae Cho; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Chan-Jin Park; Lee-Ra Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  A comparative study of gold UCLA-type and CAD/CAM titanium implant abutments.

Authors:  Ji-Man Park; Jai-Bong Lee; Seong-Joo Heo; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.

Authors:  Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Maria Luiza Cabral Maia; Susanne S Scherrer; Antonio Carlos Cardoso; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment.

Authors:  Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Wellington Cardoso Bonachela; Anuar Antônio Xible
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Influence of the implant abutment types and the dynamic loading on initial screw loosening.

Authors:  Eun-Sook Kim; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.