UNLABELLED: The high glucose utilization of normal gray matter limits the detection of brain tumor tissue by PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the examination of amino acid transport with the SPECT tracer 123l-alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine (IMT) allows better identification of tumor tissue than FDG-PET. METHODS: Nineteen patients (16 with gliomas, 3 with nontumorous lesions) were included in the study. Two independent observers classified PET and SPECT images as positive or negative for tumor tissue and defined the extent of tumor with regions of interest. Tracer uptake of FDG and IMT was quantified by calculating the tumor uptake relative to contralateral gray and white matter. RESULTS: SPECT studies were interpreted concordantly in 18 patients (kappa = 0.77) and all tumors were identified by both observers. PET studies were interpreted discordantly in 4 patients (kappa = 0.52) and only 10 tumors were identified by both observers, interobserver variability in definition of tumor extent was significantly lower in the IMT-SPECT than in the FDG-PET studies (p = 0.03). Mean tumor uptake relative to gray and white matter was 1.93 +/- 0.42 and 2.25 +/- 0.46 for IMT and 0.93 +/- 0.32 and 1.61 +/- 0.52 for FDG. All tumor uptake ratios were significantly (p < 0.01) higher for IMT than FDG, even when only glioblastomas were analyzed. No significant correlation was observed between the various uptake ratios of FDG and IMT. CONCLUSION: Despite the lower resolution and lower sensitivity of SPECT compared with PET, IMT-SPECT was clearly superior to FDG-PET in the detection and delineation of tumor tissue.
UNLABELLED: The high glucose utilization of normal gray matter limits the detection of brain tumor tissue by PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the examination of amino acid transport with the SPECT tracer 123l-alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine (IMT) allows better identification of tumor tissue than FDG-PET. METHODS: Nineteen patients (16 with gliomas, 3 with nontumorous lesions) were included in the study. Two independent observers classified PET and SPECT images as positive or negative for tumor tissue and defined the extent of tumor with regions of interest. Tracer uptake of FDG and IMT was quantified by calculating the tumor uptake relative to contralateral gray and white matter. RESULTS: SPECT studies were interpreted concordantly in 18 patients (kappa = 0.77) and all tumors were identified by both observers. PET studies were interpreted discordantly in 4 patients (kappa = 0.52) and only 10 tumors were identified by both observers, interobserver variability in definition of tumor extent was significantly lower in the IMT-SPECT than in the FDG-PET studies (p = 0.03). Mean tumor uptake relative to gray and white matter was 1.93 +/- 0.42 and 2.25 +/- 0.46 for IMT and 0.93 +/- 0.32 and 1.61 +/- 0.52 for FDG. All tumor uptake ratios were significantly (p < 0.01) higher for IMT than FDG, even when only glioblastomas were analyzed. No significant correlation was observed between the various uptake ratios of FDG and IMT. CONCLUSION: Despite the lower resolution and lower sensitivity of SPECT compared with PET, IMT-SPECT was clearly superior to FDG-PET in the detection and delineation of tumor tissue.
Authors: Dirk Hellwig; Ralf Ketter; Bernd F M Romeike; Andrea Schaefer; Georgios Farmakis; Aleksandar Grgic; Jean R Moringlane; Wolf-Ingo Steudel; Carl-Martin Kirsch; Samuel Samnick Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yuka Yamamoto; Terence Z Wong; Timothy G Turkington; Thomas C Hawk; David A Reardon; R Edward Coleman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Dirk Hellwig; Ralf Ketter; Bernd F M Romeike; Nadja Sell; Andrea Schaefer; Jean R Moringlane; Carl-Martin Kirsch; Samuel Samnick Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-05-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Y Yamamoto; Y Nishiyama; N Kimura; R Kameyama; N Kawai; T Hatakeyama; M Kaji; M Ohkawa Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 3.488