Literature DB >> 9169811

Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.

P A Kupelian1, J Katcher, H S Levin, E A Klein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is extensively used in case selection and outcome evaluation after treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Careful case selection can have a profound impact on pathologic findings and ultimate outcome. In addition, salvage treatment is frequently initiated at the time of biochemical relapse rather than clinical recurrence. Consequently, patterns of failure can be significantly altered compared to previous times when PSA was not available. To better understand the impact of PSA on pathologic findings, outcome, and salvage treatment, we reviewed our experience in the PSA era with clinical Stage T1-2 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1987 and 1993, 423 cases could be identified with clinical Stage T1-2 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. The distribution of cases by pretreatment PSA levels was as follows: < or = 4 ng/ml (18%), 4-10 ng/ml (42%), 10-20 ng/ml (21%), > 20 ng/ml (14%), and unknown (5%). The median pretreatment PSA level for the entire group was 8.0 ng/ml. Sixteen patients received adjuvant or neoadjuvant androgen suppression and 13 received postoperative radiotherapy. Only 31 patients (7%) had pathologically positive pelvic lymph nodes. The overall margin involvement rate was 46%. Fifty-three percent of patients had surgical Gleason scores > or = 7, and 65% had extracapsular extension. The median follow-up time was 41 months.
RESULTS: The projected overall survival at 7 years after surgery was 90%. The 5-year clinical relapse-free survival rate was 84%. At 5 years, the local control and distant failure rates were 92% and 91%, respectively. Biochemical relapse was defined as a detectable or rising PSA level after prostatectomy. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate was 59%. The 5-year RFS was 88% in patients with preoperative PSA levels < or = 4, 62% for 4-10, 48% for 10-20, and 31% for > 20. Combining the two independent preoperative variables, iPSA and biopsy GS (bGS), two risks groups were defined: low risk [initial PSA (iPSA) levels < or = 10.0 and bGS < or = 6] and high risk (iPSA levels > 10.0 ng/ml or bGS > or = 7). The 5-year bRFS rate for the low-risk cases was 81% vs. 40% for high-risk cases (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, three factors independently predicted biochemical relapse: iPSA levels (p = 0.005), Gleason score from the surgical specimen (sGS) (p = 0.002), and positive surgical margins (p < or = 0.001). The 5-year bRFS rates for margin positive vs. margin negative patients were 37% vs. 78%, respectively. The 5-year bRFS rates for GS > or = 7 vs. GS > or = 6 were 42% vs. 80%, respectively. All clinical relapses were accompanied by a rise in PSA. In patients who manifested biochemical failure followed by a clinical failure, the median interval between the PSA rise and clinical failure was 19 months (range 7-71). Margin involvement was the only independent predictor of local failure (p = 0.019). The 5-year local failure-free survival for negative margin cases was 96% vs. 87% for positive margin cases (p = 0.012). Lymph node (LN) involvement and high-risk group were the two independent predictors of distant failure. The 5-year distant failure-free survival for negative LN cases was 94% vs. 67% for positive LN cases (p < 0.001). The 5-year distant failure-free survival for low-risk cases was 97% vs. 85% for high-risk cases (p = 0.005). For the 124 patients failing biochemically, 85 were observed and 39 were treated either with radiation or androgen deprivation. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the clinical disease relapse-free survival was 79% for the treated patients vs. only 32% for the patients observed (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment PSA is the most potent clinical factor independently predicting biochemical relapse, thereby allowing markedly better case selection. Achieving negative margins, even in relatively advanced disease, provides excellent lon

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169811     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00590-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Organ-limited prostate cancer with positive resection margins. Importance of adjuvant radiation therapy].

Authors:  D Porres; D Pfister; B Brehmer; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Meta-analysis of the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on prognosis of prostatic cancer following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fan He; Zhenqiang Fang; Chongxing Shen; Longkun Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

4.  Postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors in a series of 282 patients.

Authors:  Giuseppina Apicella; Debora Beldì; Giansilvio Marchioro; Sara Torrente; Sara Tunesi; Corrado Magnani; Alessandro Volpe; Carlo Terrone; Marco Krengli
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-11-01

5.  Predictors of prostate bed recurrence on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicola J Nasser; Victoria Chernyak; Viswanathan Shankar; Madhur Garg; William Bodner; Shalom Kalnicki; Jonathan Klein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Bicalutamide adjuvant to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  William A See
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

7.  Success and failure of single-modality treatment for early prostate cancer.

Authors:  David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

8.  Early diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

9.  Radiotherapy augments the immune response to prostate cancer in a time-dependent manner.

Authors:  Timothy J Harris; Edward L Hipkiss; Scott Borzillary; Satoshi Wada; Joseph F Grosso; Hung-Rong Yen; Derese Getnet; Tullia C Bruno; Monica V Goldberg; Drew M Pardoll; Theodore L DeWeese; Charles G Drake
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 10.  Adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: when is it indicated?

Authors:  Stephen M Graham; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.