BACKGROUND: Cancer immunotherapy refers to an array of strategies intended to treat progressive tumors by augmenting a patient's anti-tumor immune response. As immunotherapy is eventually incorporated into oncology treatment paradigms, it is important to understand how these therapies interact with established cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or Radiotherapy (RT). To address this, we utilized a well-established, autochthonous murine model of prostate cancer to test whether RT could augment (or diminish) the CD4 T cell response to a tumor vaccine. METHODS: Transgenic mice that develop spontaneous prostate cancer (TRAMP) which also express a unique tumor associated antigen (Influenza hemagglutinin) under the control of a prostate-specific promoter were given local RT in combination with immunotherapy. The immunological outcome of this combinatorial strategy was assayed by monitoring the effector response of adoptively transferred, prostate-specific CD4 T cells. RESULTS: Neither RT nor immunotherapy alone was capable of priming an anti-tumor immune response in animals with evolving tumors. The combination of immunotherapy with RT resulted in anti-tumor T cell activation--this effect was profoundly dependent on the relative timing of RT and immunotherapy. Anti-tumor immune responses occurred when immunotherapy was administered 3-5 weeks post-RT, but such responses were undetectable when immunotherapy was administered either earlier (peri-radiotherapy) or later. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic temporal window of immunotherapy post-RT suggests that highly aggressive, immuno-suppressive tumors might be most sensitive to immunotherapy in a fairly narrow time window; these results should help to guide future development of clinical combinatorial strategies. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Cancer immunotherapy refers to an array of strategies intended to treat progressive tumors by augmenting a patient's anti-tumor immune response. As immunotherapy is eventually incorporated into oncology treatment paradigms, it is important to understand how these therapies interact with established cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or Radiotherapy (RT). To address this, we utilized a well-established, autochthonous murine model of prostate cancer to test whether RT could augment (or diminish) the CD4 T cell response to a tumor vaccine. METHODS:Transgenic mice that develop spontaneous prostate cancer (TRAMP) which also express a unique tumor associated antigen (Influenza hemagglutinin) under the control of a prostate-specific promoter were given local RT in combination with immunotherapy. The immunological outcome of this combinatorial strategy was assayed by monitoring the effector response of adoptively transferred, prostate-specific CD4 T cells. RESULTS: Neither RT nor immunotherapy alone was capable of priming an anti-tumor immune response in animals with evolving tumors. The combination of immunotherapy with RT resulted in anti-tumor T cell activation--this effect was profoundly dependent on the relative timing of RT and immunotherapy. Anti-tumor immune responses occurred when immunotherapy was administered 3-5 weeks post-RT, but such responses were undetectable when immunotherapy was administered either earlier (peri-radiotherapy) or later. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic temporal window of immunotherapy post-RT suggests that highly aggressive, immuno-suppressive tumors might be most sensitive to immunotherapy in a fairly narrow time window; these results should help to guide future development of clinical combinatorial strategies. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: P Mauch; L Constine; J Greenberger; W Knospe; J Sullivan; J L Liesveld; H J Deeg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-03-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: N M Greenberg; F DeMayo; M J Finegold; D Medina; W D Tilley; J O Aspinall; G R Cunha; A A Donjacour; R J Matusik; J M Rosen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J R Gingrich; R J Barrios; R A Morton; B F Boyce; F J DeMayo; M J Finegold; R Angelopoulou; J M Rosen; N M Greenberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Frederik Soetaert; Preethi Korangath; David Serantes; Steven Fiering; Robert Ivkov Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Andrew B Sharabi; Phuoc T Tran; Michael Lim; Charles G Drake; Theodore L Deweese Journal: Oncology (Williston Park) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.990
Authors: Eugene D Kwon; Charles G Drake; Howard I Scher; Karim Fizazi; Alberto Bossi; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Michael Krainer; Nadine Houede; Ricardo Santos; Hakim Mahammedi; Siobhan Ng; Michele Maio; Fabio A Franke; Santhanam Sundar; Neeraj Agarwal; Andries M Bergman; Tudor E Ciuleanu; Ernesto Korbenfeld; Lisa Sengeløv; Steinbjorn Hansen; Christopher Logothetis; Tomasz M Beer; M Brent McHenry; Paul Gagnier; David Liu; Winald R Gerritsen Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Maureen L Aliru; Jonathan E Schoenhals; Bhanu P Venkatesulu; Clark C Anderson; Hampartsoum B Barsoumian; Ahmed I Younes; Lakshmi S K Mahadevan; Melinda Soeung; Kathryn E Aziz; James W Welsh; Sunil Krishnan Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Grit S Herter-Sprie; Shohei Koyama; Houari Korideck; Josephine Hai; Jiehui Deng; Yvonne Y Li; Kevin A Buczkowski; Aaron K Grant; Soumya Ullas; Kevin Rhee; Jillian D Cavanaugh; Neermala Poudel Neupane; Camilla L Christensen; Jan M Herter; G Mike Makrigiorgos; F Stephen Hodi; Gordon J Freeman; Glenn Dranoff; Peter S Hammerman; Alec C Kimmelman; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-06-16