L Ruess1, D I Bulas, O Rivera, B M Markle. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine in-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of computed tomographic (CT) contrast media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five 3.0-7.0-F central venous catheters for pediatric patients were tested at full and half lengths in vitro. In-line pressures were measured during power injection of three contrast media. Rates of injection were increased in steps from 0.1 to 5.0 mL/sec or until a peak pressure of 100 psi (700 kPa) was achieved. The maximum tolerated flow rate was determined with reference to the manufacturer's suggested operating pressure limit for each catheter. RESULTS: At full length, the maximum tolerated flow rates were as follows: 2-3 mL/sec for the large lumen and 1-1.4 mL/sec for the small lumen of the 7.0-F double-lumen catheter; 0.2-0.4 and 0.8-1.2 mL/sec for the 3.0- and 4.0-F peripherally inserted central catheters, respectively; 0.7-1.2 mL/sec for the 6.6-F catheter; and only 0.2 mL/sec for the 4.2-F catheter, which ruptured during testing at higher flow rates. CONCLUSION: Flow rates were documented at which certain small-bore central venous catheters should tolerate power injection of CT contrast media with peak pressures remaining below the manufacturer's recommended operating pressure limits. These data may serve as a guide for clinical use.
PURPOSE: To determine in-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of computed tomographic (CT) contrast media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five 3.0-7.0-F central venous catheters for pediatric patients were tested at full and half lengths in vitro. In-line pressures were measured during power injection of three contrast media. Rates of injection were increased in steps from 0.1 to 5.0 mL/sec or until a peak pressure of 100 psi (700 kPa) was achieved. The maximum tolerated flow rate was determined with reference to the manufacturer's suggested operating pressure limit for each catheter. RESULTS: At full length, the maximum tolerated flow rates were as follows: 2-3 mL/sec for the large lumen and 1-1.4 mL/sec for the small lumen of the 7.0-F double-lumen catheter; 0.2-0.4 and 0.8-1.2 mL/sec for the 3.0- and 4.0-F peripherally inserted central catheters, respectively; 0.7-1.2 mL/sec for the 6.6-F catheter; and only 0.2 mL/sec for the 4.2-F catheter, which ruptured during testing at higher flow rates. CONCLUSION: Flow rates were documented at which certain small-bore central venous catheters should tolerate power injection of CT contrast media with peak pressures remaining below the manufacturer's recommended operating pressure limits. These data may serve as a guide for clinical use.