Literature DB >> 9169453

DNA bending is essential for the site-specific recognition of DNA response elements by the DNA binding domain of the tumor suppressor protein p53.

A K Nagaich1, E Appella, R E Harrington.   

Abstract

We have used circular permutation assays to determine the extent and location of the DNA bend induced by the DNA binding domain of human wild type p53 (p53DBD) upon binding to several naturally occurring DNA response elements. We have found that p53DBD binding induces axial bending in all of the response elements investigated. In particular, response elements having a d(CATG) sequence at the junction of two consensus pentamers in each half-site favor highly bent complexes (bending angle is approximately 50 degrees ), whereas response elements having d(CTTG) bases at this position are less bent (bending angles from approximately 37 to approximately 25 degrees ). Quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays of different complexes show a direct correlation between the DNA bending angle and the binding affinity of the p53DBD with the response elements, i.e. the greater the stability of the complex, the more the DNA is bent by p53DBD binding. The study provides evidence that the energetics of DNA bending, as determined by the presence or absence of flexible sites in the response elements, may contribute significantly to the overall binding affinity of the p53DBD for different sequences. The results therefore suggest that both the structure and the stability of the p53-DNA complex may vary with different response elements. This variability may be correlated with variability in p53 function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169453     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.23.14842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  34 in total

1.  DNA bending induced by DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases.

Authors:  T Raskó; C Finta; A Kiss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Efficient specific DNA binding by p53 requires both its central and C-terminal domains as revealed by studies with high-mobility group 1 protein.

Authors:  Kristine McKinney; Carol Prives
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  p53-induced DNA bending and twisting: p53 tetramer binds on the outer side of a DNA loop and increases DNA twisting.

Authors:  A K Nagaich; V B Zhurkin; S R Durell; R L Jernigan; E Appella; R E Harrington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A p53-type response element in the GDF15 promoter confers high specificity for p53 activation.

Authors:  Motonobu Osada; Hannah Lui Park; Min Joo Park; Jun-Wei Liu; Guojun Wu; Barry Trink; David Sidransky
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  p53 binding to nucleosomal DNA depends on the rotational positioning of DNA response element.

Authors:  Geetaram Sahu; Difei Wang; Claudia B Chen; Victor B Zhurkin; Rodney E Harrington; Ettore Appella; Gordon L Hager; Akhilesh K Nagaich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Activation of p53 function by human transcriptional coactivator PC4: role of protein-protein interaction, DNA bending, and posttranslational modifications.

Authors:  Kiran Batta; Tapas K Kundu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Identification of a novel class of genomic DNA-binding sites suggests a mechanism for selectivity in target gene activation by the tumor suppressor protein p53.

Authors:  L Resnick-Silverman; S St Clair; M Maurer; K Zhao; J J Manfredi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Rad54 Phosphorylation Promotes Homologous Recombination by Balancing Rad54 Mobility and DNA Binding.

Authors:  Nicor Lengert; Julian Spies; Barbara Drossel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  The expanding universe of p53 targets.

Authors:  Daniel Menendez; Alberto Inga; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Crystal structure of a p53 core tetramer bound to DNA.

Authors:  K A Malecka; W C Ho; R Marmorstein
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.