Literature DB >> 9169309

Efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine compared with imipramine in a double-blind study in patients suffering from major depressive offsodes.

H Berzewski1, M Van Moffaert, C A Gagiano.   

Abstract

A 6-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study in 256 patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of major depression was carried out to compare the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (NARI), reboxetine, with the reference standard tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine. The efficacy of reboxetine, as measured by the extent of improvement of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale, was similar to that of imipramine. The improvement was observed in the overall population and in severely depressed and melancholic patients. Reboxetine tolerability compared favourably with that of imipramine. Frequency of discontinuation due to adverse events was lower in the reboxetine-treated group (10.0%) than in the imipramine-treated group (14.3%), and the cumulative risk of development (Kaplan-Meier analysis) of dry mouth, hypotension and/or related symptoms and tremor was significantly higher on imipramine than on reboxetine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169309     DOI: 10.1016/s0924-977x(97)00418-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  12 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation antidepressants: do they offer advantages over the SSRIs?

Authors:  J S Olver; G D Burrows; T R Norman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Bipolar depression: management options.

Authors:  Gin S Malhi; Philip B Mitchell; Shahzad Salim
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the norepinephrine transporter radioligand (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2: a human whole-body PET study.

Authors:  Akihiro Takano; Christer Halldin; Andrea Varrone; Per Karlsson; Nils Sjöholm; James B Stubbs; Magnus Schou; Anu J Airaksinen; Johannes Tauscher; Balázs Gulyás
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine in depressive patients treated in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Thomas Messer; Max Schmauss; Judith Lambert-Baumann
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Selecting an antidepressant for use in a patient with epilepsy. Safety considerations.

Authors:  S Curran; K de Pauw
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Depression in adults: drug and physical treatments.

Authors:  Corrado Barbui; Rob Butler; Andrea Cipriani; John Geddes; Simon Hatcher
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-06-15

7.  Reboxetine: a preliminary report on its use through the Special Access Program.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam; Nicole L Cohen; Michael Rosenbluth; Stephen T H Sokolov; Roger S McIntyre; Pierre Chue; Gerry Craigen
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 8.  Antidepressants and falls in the elderly.

Authors:  Adam Darowski; Sally-Ann C F Chambers; David J Chambers
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Nicotinic receptor-based therapeutics and candidates for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Linda P Dwoskin; Andrew M Smith; Thomas E Wooters; Zhenfa Zhang; Peter A Crooks; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Saturated norepinephrine transporter occupancy by atomoxetine relevant to clinical doses: a rhesus monkey study with (S,S)-[(18)F]FMeNER-D (2).

Authors:  Akihiro Takano; Balázs Gulyás; Andrea Varrone; Ralph Paul Maguire; Christer Halldin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.