Literature DB >> 9169299

Pharmacological treatment of severely depressed patients: a meta-analysis comparing efficacy of mirtazapine and amitriptyline.

S Kasper1, M Zivkov, K C Roes, A G Pols.   

Abstract

Efficacy data were available from 405 severely depressed patients (baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-HAMD scores > or = 25) participating in randomized, double-blind, amitriptyline-controlled studies of mirtazapine. Main efficacy variable were changes from baseline in the group mean 17-item HAMD scores and responder rates. Secondary efficacy variables were changes in depressed mood item on the HAMD and in factors derived from the 17-item HAMD scale. Treatment with either mirtazapine or amitriptyline resulted in robust reductions of baseline HAMD scores and in similar and high percentages of responders. Both drugs produced favourable effects on depressed mood and on symptoms commonly associated with depression, such as anxiety, sleep and vegetative disturbances. There were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant differences between mirtazapine and amitriptyline at any assessment point nor at endpoint. The results demonstrate that the new antidepressant mirtazapine and the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline are equally effective in the treatment of severely depressed patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169299     DOI: 10.1016/s0924-977x(96)00394-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  Mirtazapine. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.

Authors:  K J Holm; B Jarvis; R H Foster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression.

Authors:  K J Holm; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Mirtazapine for treatment-resistant depression: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Dante D C Wan; Divya Kundhur; Kevin Solomons; Lakshmi N Yatham; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of mirtazapine in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  S Kasper; N Praschak-Rieder; J Tauscher; R Wolf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  The DSM-IV definition of severity of major depression: inter-relationship and validity.

Authors:  V Lux; S H Aggen; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 7.  Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression and other psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Caroline M Perry; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Vilazodone efficacy in subgroups of patients with major depressive disorder: a post-hoc analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Susan Kornstein; Cheng-Tao Chang; Carl P Gommoll; John Edwards
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.659

9.  Major Depression and the Degree of Suicidality: Results of the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD).

Authors:  Markus Dold; Lucie Bartova; Gernot Fugger; Alexander Kautzky; Daniel Souery; Julien Mendlewicz; George N Papadimitriou; Dimitris Dikeos; Panagiotis Ferentinos; Stefano Porcelli; Alessandro Serretti; Joseph Zohar; Stuart Montgomery; Siegfried Kasper
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.176

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.