BACKGROUND: Severity is an important characteristic of major depression (MD) and an 'episode specifier' in DSM-IV classifying depressive episodes as 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe'. These severity subtypes rely on three different measures of severity: number of criteria symptoms, severity of the symptoms and degree of functional disability. No prior empirical study has evaluated the coherence and validity of the DSM-IV definition of severity of MD. METHOD: In a sample of 1015 (518 males, 497 females) Caucasian twins from a population-based registry who met criteria for MD in the year prior to interview, factor analysis and logistic regression were conducted to examine the inter-relationships of the three severity measures and their associations with a wide range of potential validators including demographic factors, risk for future episodes, risk of MD in the co-twin, characteristics of the depressive episode, the pattern of co-morbidity, and personality traits. RESULTS: Correlations between the three severity measures were significant but moderate. Factor analysis indicated the existence of a general severity factor, but the factor was not highly coherent. The three severity measures showed differential predictive ability for most of the validators. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of MD as defined by the DSM-IV is a multifaceted and heterogeneous construct. The three proposed severity measures reflect partly overlapping but partly independent domains with differential validity as assessed by a wide range of clinical characteristics. Clinicians should probably use a combination of severity measures as proposed in DSM-IV rather than privileging one.
BACKGROUND: Severity is an important characteristic of major depression (MD) and an 'episode specifier' in DSM-IV classifying depressive episodes as 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe'. These severity subtypes rely on three different measures of severity: number of criteria symptoms, severity of the symptoms and degree of functional disability. No prior empirical study has evaluated the coherence and validity of the DSM-IV definition of severity of MD. METHOD: In a sample of 1015 (518 males, 497 females) Caucasian twins from a population-based registry who met criteria for MD in the year prior to interview, factor analysis and logistic regression were conducted to examine the inter-relationships of the three severity measures and their associations with a wide range of potential validators including demographic factors, risk for future episodes, risk of MD in the co-twin, characteristics of the depressive episode, the pattern of co-morbidity, and personality traits. RESULTS: Correlations between the three severity measures were significant but moderate. Factor analysis indicated the existence of a general severity factor, but the factor was not highly coherent. The three severity measures showed differential predictive ability for most of the validators. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of MD as defined by the DSM-IV is a multifaceted and heterogeneous construct. The three proposed severity measures reflect partly overlapping but partly independent domains with differential validity as assessed by a wide range of clinical characteristics. Clinicians should probably use a combination of severity measures as proposed in DSM-IV rather than privileging one.
Authors: Sidney Zisook; A John Rush; Ari Albala; Jonathan Alpert; G K Balasubramani; Maurizio Fava; Mustafa Husain; Harold Sackeim; Madhukar Trivedi; Stephen Wisniewski Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Rebecca W Iannuzzo; Judith Jaeger; Joseph F Goldberg; Vivian Kafantaris; M Elizabeth Sublette Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2006-10-16 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Thomas J Carmody; A John Rush; Ira Bernstein; Diane Warden; Stephen Brannan; Daniel Burnham; Ada Woo; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2006-06-12 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Lisa V Rubenstein; Nadine R Rayburn; Emmett B Keeler; Daniel E Ford; Kathryn M Rost; Cathy D Sherbourne Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Marc B J Blom; Philip Spinhoven; Tonko Hoffman; Kosse Jonker; Erik Hoencamp; P M Judith Haffmans; Richard van Dyck Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2007-04-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Habab Khalid Elkheir; Arwa Siddig Wagaella; Safaa Badi; Abbas Khalil; Tarig Hassan Elzubair; Atif Khalil; Mohamed H Ahmed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2020-07-30
Authors: María Cabello; Francisco Félix Caballero; Somnath Chatterji; Alarcos Cieza; José Luis Ayuso-Mateos Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: João P Pacheco; Henrique T Giacomin; Wilson W Tam; Tássia B Ribeiro; Claudia Arab; Italla M Bezerra; Gustavo C Pinasco Journal: Braz J Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 2.697
Authors: Hanna M van Loo; Peter de Jonge; Jan-Willem Romeijn; Ronald C Kessler; Robert A Schoevers Journal: BMC Med Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 8.775