Literature DB >> 9168086

Retrorectus prosthetic mesh repair of midline abdominal hernia.

D McLanahan1, L T King, C Weems, M Novotney, K Gibson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midline abdominal hernia is a common problem seen by the general surgeon. Recurrence rates are as high as 49% when an autogenous repair is performed, and as high as 11% when prosthetic mesh is used as a "bridge" or "onlay."
METHODS: This study analyzes results of midline abdominal hernia repair in 106 cases using prosthetic mesh, in the retrorectus position, as described by Stoppa and Wantz. Charts were reviewed, patient satisfaction determined by telephone interview, and recurrence rate by physician examination.
RESULTS: Major systemic complications occurred in 17%. There were no deaths. Eighteen percent developed a wound complication, requiring a return to the operating room in 5%. There were three recurrences (3.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Retrorectus placement of prosthetic mesh in the repair of midline abdominal hernia is effective and compares favorably with other methods. Significant complications are low, recurrence is rare, and patient satisfaction is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9168086     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89582-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  48 in total

1.  Prosthetic repair of incisional hernia in kidney transplant patients. A technique with onlay polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  C Birolini; E Mazzucchi; E M Utiyama; W Nahas; A J Rodrigues; S Arap; D Birolini
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair.

Authors:  J A Halm; J W A Burger; J Jeekel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Prosthetic strap system for simplified ventral hernia repair: results of a porcine experimental model.

Authors:  G Amato; G Romano; A Agrusa; G Cassata; G Salamone; G Gulotta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Strength of tissue attachment to mesh after ventral hernia repair with synthetic composite mesh in a porcine model.

Authors:  S Majercik; V Tsikitis; D A Iannitti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Francisco Asencio; Javier Aguiló; Salvador Peiró; Juan Carbó; Ramón Ferri; Federico Caro; Marwan Ahmad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Retrorectus polyester mesh repair for midline ventral hernias.

Authors:  A A Wheeler; S T Matz; S L Bachman; K Thaler; B W Miedema
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Current status of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  D S Thoman; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  No enterocutaneous fistula development in a cohort of 695 patients after incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal uncoated polyproylene mesh.

Authors:  C D Brandi; S Roche; S Bertone; M E Fratantoni
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Prognosis factors in incisional hernia surgery: 25 years of experience.

Authors:  C Langer; A Schaper; T Liersch; B Kulle; M Flosman; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.