Literature DB >> 9167822

Diagnosis of anterolateral ankle impingement. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination.

S H Liu1, S L Nuccion, G Finerman.   

Abstract

We reviewed 22 patients who had arthroscopic evaluations and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies of their ankles because of chronic anterolateral ankle pain after sprains. The ability of surgeons to use the initial clinical examination to predict arthroscopically confirmed anterolateral ankle impingement was compared with the ability to predict this condition using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. The patient population consisted of 15 men and 7 women who had an average age of 28 years. Five patients (23%) were intercollegiate athletes and 17 patients (77%) were recreational athletes. All patients reported previous traumas to the involved ankles, and all were seen with chronic ankle pain. Clinical examinations were used to assess ankle pain, swelling, range of motion, and stability. Anterolateral ankle impingement was confirmed in 18 patients (82%) with arthroscopic examination. Clinical examinations had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 75% for predicting impingement, and magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 50%. The results of this study suggest that preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination is not beneficial or cost-effective in the diagnosis of anterolateral ankle impingement; furthermore, its use may cause further delay in treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9167822     DOI: 10.1177/036354659702500320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  10 in total

Review 1.  Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain.

Authors:  J Hertel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Update on anterior ankle impingement.

Authors:  Tanawat Vaseenon; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

Review 3.  Impingement syndromes of the ankle.

Authors:  Philip Robinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Ankle impingement syndromes: an imaging review.

Authors:  Zachary Berman; Monica Tafur; Sonya S Ahmed; Brady K Huang; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  FS-3D-FISP for the diagnosis of ankle impingement syndrome and the evaluation of clinical outcomes of arthroscopic surgery.

Authors:  Shuijun Zhang; Chen Zhao; Bing Xia; Danjie Zhu; Bingsong Qiu; Haifeng Gu; Jianfei Hong; Qing Bi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-22

6.  Combined arthroscopic management of concurrent posterior and anterior ankle pathologies.

Authors:  Nasef Mohamed Nasef Abdelatif
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anterolateral ankle impingement: findings and diagnostic accuracy with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  C L McCarthy; D J Wilson; T P Coltman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Ankle impingement: a review of multimodality imaging approach.

Authors:  A Russo; M Zappia; A Reginelli; M Carfora; G F D'Agosto; M La Porta; E A Genovese; P Fonio
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

9.  Distraction-free ankle arthroscopy for anterolateral impingement.

Authors:  Jean Louis Rouvillain; Wael Daoud; Adrian Donica; Emmanuel Garron; André Pierre Uzel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-13

10.  Ankle MRI for anterolateral soft tissue impingement: increased accuracy with the use of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D-FSPGR MRI.

Authors:  Hye Jung Choo; Jin-Suck Suh; Sung-Jun Kim; Yong-Min Huh; Myung In Kim; Jin-Woo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.