Literature DB >> 18064426

Anterolateral ankle impingement: findings and diagnostic accuracy with ultrasound imaging.

C L McCarthy1, D J Wilson, T P Coltman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the findings and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in antero-lateral ankle impingement (ALI) with clinical and arthroscopic correlation. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Seventeen elite footballers with chronic ankle pain were referred for ultrasound with a clinical diagnosis of ALI (n = 8) or a control condition (n = 9; lateral mechanical instability, osteochondral defect, intra-articular bodies and osteoarthritis). Ultrasound examination included the antero-lateral gutter for abnormal synovial tissue (synovitic lesion), lateral ligament integrity, tibiotalar joint and osseous spurs of the distal tibia and talus. Ultrasound findings were correlated with subsequent arthroscopic appearance.
RESULTS: Ultrasound examination detected a synovitic mass in the antero-lateral gutter in all 8 footballers with clinical ALI (100%) and in 2 patients with a control diagnosis (22%). Arthroscopic correlation of antero-lateral synovitis and fibrosis was present in all 10 cases (100%). The synovitic lesion was seen at ultrasound as a nodular soft tissue mass of mixed echogenicity within the antero-lateral gutter, which extruded anteriorly with manual compression of the distal fibula against the tibia. Increased blood supply was detected using power Doppler imaging in only 1 patient. The synovitic lesion measured >10 mm in its maximum dimension in 7 footballers with clinical ALI and <10 mm in the control group. Additional ultrasound findings in patients with abnormal antero-lateral synovial tissue included an anterior talofibular ligament injury in all patients (n = 10), a tibiotalar joint effusion (n = 6) and osseous spurs (n = 4). Antero-lateral synovitic tissue was accurately identified at ultrasound in the absence of an effusion (n = 4). No synovitic lesion was detected at ultrasound or arthroscopy in the remaining 7 patients with a control diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is accurate in detecting synovitic lesions within the antero-lateral gutter, demonstrating associated ligamentous injuries and in differentiating soft tissue from osseous impingement. Synovitic lesions in two control patients suggest that abnormal antero-lateral soft tissue does not necessarily imply the presence of symptomatic ALI. Synovitic lesions in excess of 10 mm were associated with symptoms. Ultrasound will not demonstrate osteocartilaginous lesions or stress fractures and may overlook some loose bodies. Ultrasound findings together with clinical correlation can be used to direct arthroscopic examination and surgical debridement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18064426     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0411-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  MR-imaging of anterior tibiotalar impingement syndrome: agreement, sensitivity and specificity of MR-imaging and indirect MR-arthrography.

Authors:  Jörg Haller; Reinhard Bernt; Thomas Seeger; Alexander Weissenbäck; Heinrich Tüchler; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  MR imaging of ankle impingement syndromes.

Authors:  Luis Cerezal; Faustino Abascal; Ana Canga; Teresa Pereda; Roberto García-Valtuille; Luis Pérez-Carro; Antonio Cruz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Subacute posteromedial impingement of the ankle in athletes: MR imaging evaluation and ultrasound guided therapy.

Authors:  Christina Messiou; Philip Robinson; Philip J O'Connor; Andrew Grainger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography.

Authors:  D Bergin; M E Schweitzer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Anterolateral soft-tissue impingement in the ankle: diagnosis using MR imaging.

Authors:  D A Rubin; N W Tishkoff; C A Britton; S F Conti; J D Towers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Arthroscopic treatment of soft-tissue impingement of the ankle in athletes.

Authors:  T M DeBerardino; R A Arciero; D C Taylor
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Anterolateral impingement of the ankle: effectiveness of MR imaging.

Authors:  S Farooki; L Yao; L L Seeger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnosis of anterolateral ankle impingement. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination.

Authors:  S H Liu; S L Nuccion; G Finerman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings in anterolateral impingement of the ankle.

Authors:  L K Jordan; C A Helms; A E Cooperman; K P Speer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Arthroscopic treatment of anterolateral ankle impingement.

Authors:  S H Liu; A Raskin; L Osti; C Baker; K Jacobson; G Finerman; C ] Baber C [corrected to Baker
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  16 in total

1.  Update on anterior ankle impingement.

Authors:  Tanawat Vaseenon; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

2.  Lower Extremity Injury Patterns in Elite Ballet Dancers: Ultrasound/MRI Imaging Features and an Institutional Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Interventions.

Authors:  Razia Rehmani; Yoshimi Endo; Phillip Bauman; William Hamilton; Hollis Potter; Ronald Adler
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 3.  Review of common and unusual causes of lateral ankle pain.

Authors:  Surabhi Choudhary; Eugene McNally
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination tests of the ankle/foot complex: a systematic review.

Authors:  Braun Schwieterman; Deniele Haas; Kirby Columber; Darren Knupp; Chad Cook
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

Review 5.  [Significance of sonography in traumatology and orthopedics: part 1: ultrasonography of the musculoskeletal system].

Authors:  C Tesch; B Friemert; J Huhnholz; J V Wening
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Ankle impingement syndromes: an imaging review.

Authors:  Zachary Berman; Monica Tafur; Sonya S Ahmed; Brady K Huang; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  US in ankle impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lionel Pesquer; Stephane Guillo; Philippe Meyer; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 8.  Ankle ultrasound for detecting anterior talofibular ligament tear using operative finding as reference standard: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sun Hwa Lee; Seong Jong Yun
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Increased ligament thickness in previously sprained ankles as measured by musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Authors:  Kathy Liu; Geoff Gustavsen; Todd Royer; Erik A Wikstrom; Joseph Glutting; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Lateral Ankle Ligament Injury, Instability, and Anterior Ankle Impingement: A Diagnostic Case Report.

Authors:  Patrick J Battaglia; Kate Craig; Norman W Kettner
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2015-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.