Literature DB >> 9167660

Current classification of fractures. Rationale and utility.

J S Martin1, J L Marsh.   

Abstract

Fracture classification systems are used on a daily basis in any busy orthopedic clinic. They are an essential means by which physicians communicate, make treatment decisions, estimate prognosis, and report and compare results. Until recently, these classifications have been designed, accepted, and utilized without formal critique. By studying and understanding the shortcomings of previous systems, we can use this knowledge to construct better ones. Ideally, a fracture classification, like any classification, should be reliable, reproducible, all inclusive, mutually exclusive, logical, and clinically useful. The AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures provides a unified scheme of classification for fractures of the entire skeleton. Despite addressing many of the faults of previous classifications, the observer agreement for this system drops to unacceptable levels at the group and subgroup levels. Further study is warranted to determine how this agreement can be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9167660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  23 in total

1.  High density polyetherurethane foam as a fragmentation and radiographic surrogate for cortical bone.

Authors:  C L Beardsley; A D Heiner; E A Brandser; J L Marsh; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

2.  QCT-based failure analysis of proximal femurs under various loading orientations.

Authors:  Majid Mirzaei; Maziyar Keshavarzian; Fatemeh Alavi; Pegah Amiri; Saeid Samiezadeh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Under-utilization of the OTA Fracture Classification in the orthopaedic trauma literature.

Authors:  U M Modhia; A J Dickens; C D Glezos; R J Gehlert; T A DeCoster
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

4.  The First AO Classification System for Fractures of the Craniomaxillofacial Skeleton: Rationale, Methodological Background, Developmental Process, and Objectives.

Authors:  Laurent Audigé; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Antonio Di Ieva; Joachim Prein
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12

5.  A Study on the Correlation of Pertrochanteric Osteoporotic Fracture Severity with the Severity of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Prabhnoor Singh Hayer; Anit Kumar Samuel Deane; Atul Agrawal; Rajesh Maheshwari; Anil Juyal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

6.  Inter- and intra-observer variation in classification systems for impending fractures of bone metastases.

Authors:  Moataz El-Husseiny; Nigel Coleman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Updated classification system for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  José M Mora Guix; Juan Sala Pedrós; Alejandro Castaño Serrano
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2009-06

8.  Agreement between Initial Classification and Subsequent Reclassification of Fractures of the Distal Radius in a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Roderick H van Leerdam; J Sebastiaan Souer; Anneluuk L C Lindenhovius; David C Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-07-09

9.  [LiLa classification for paediatric long bone fractures. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability].

Authors:  A Kamphaus; M Rapp; L M Wessel; M Buchholz; E Massalme; D Schneidmüller; C Roeder; M M Kaiser
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Are classifications of proximal radius fractures reproducible?

Authors:  Fabio T Matsunaga; Marcel J S Tamaoki; Eduardo F Cordeiro; Anderson Uehara; Marcos H Ikawa; Marcelo H Matsumoto; João B G dos Santos; João C Belloti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.