Literature DB >> 19574487

Updated classification system for proximal humeral fractures.

José M Mora Guix1, Juan Sala Pedrós, Alejandro Castaño Serrano.   

Abstract

Proximal humeral fractures can restrict daily activities and, therefore, deserve efficient diagnoses that minimize complications and sequels. For good diagnosis and treatment, patient characteristics, variability in the forms of the fractures presented, and the technical difficulties in achieving fair results with surgical treatment should all be taken into account. Current classification systems for these fractures are based on anatomical and pathological principles, and not on systematic image reading. These fractures can appear in many different forms, with many characteristics that must be identified. However, many current classification systems lack good reliability, both inter-observer and intra-observer for different image types. A new approach to image reading, following a well-designed set and sequence of variables to check, is needed. We previously reported such an image reading system. In the present study, we report a classification system based on this image reading system. Here we define 21 fracture characteristics and apply them along with classical Codman approaches to classify fractures. We base this novel classification system for classifying proximal humeral fractures on a review of scientific literature and improvements to our image reading protocol. Patient status, fracture characteristics and surgeon circumstances have been important issues in developing this system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574487      PMCID: PMC2705277          DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2009.779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1539-4182


  73 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies.

Authors:  M Bhandari; F Morrow; A V Kulkarni; P Tornetta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Robertson; J Yuan; L U Bigliani; E L Flatow; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  50 Years ago in CORR: epidemiology of fracture in aged persons: a preliminary investigation in fracture etiology Göran C. H. Bauer CORR 1960;17:219-225.

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Training improves agreement among doctors using the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures in a systematic review.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J R Center; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Arterial blood supply of the proximal humeral epiphysis.

Authors:  F Duparc; J M Muller; P Fréger
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  G O Sjödén; T Movin; P Aspelin; P Güntner; A Shalabi
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-08

8.  Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; E Seeman; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; T J Martin; B Skoric; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; A Garg; M M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-08

10.  Reliability and reproducibility of radiographic interpretation of proximal humeral fracture pathoanatomy.

Authors:  P I Sallay; R A Pedowitz; W J Mallon; R M Vandemark; J D Dalton; K P Speer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  3 in total

1.  The classification of complex 4-part humeral fractures revisited: the missing fifth fragment and indications for surgery.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Fabio Cautiero; Giuseppe Della Rotonda
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-04-19

2.  Hemiarthroplasty versus angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul A Verbeek; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Klaus W Wendt; Ron L Diercks
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Seok Won Chung; Seung Seog Han; Ji Whan Lee; Kyung-Soo Oh; Na Ra Kim; Jong Pil Yoon; Joon Yub Kim; Sung Hoon Moon; Jieun Kwon; Hyo-Jin Lee; Young-Min Noh; Youngjun Kim
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.