Literature DB >> 9167073

Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft.

P T Thomas1, S R Turner, N Rumsey, T Dowell, J R Sandy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the satisfaction of patients with clefting and their parents with facial appearance and how this alters with age. The relationship between satisfaction with appearance and psychosocial functioning was also examined.
DESIGN: Prospective
SETTING: Subjects were recruited for the study from nine hospital-based clinics. PARENTS, PARTICIPANTS: All subjects has some type of cleft and were 10, 15 or 20 years of age. In all, 111 subjects with clefting and 62 parents were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Facial appearance was rated on a subjective ordinal scale of 1 to 7; psychosocial adjustment was measured with the Childhood Experience Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Self-satisfaction with appearance among the 10- and 15-year-old subjects correlated with their psychosocial adjustment (p = .027). The 20-year-old subjects were, on average, significantly more satisfied with their appearance than the 10- and 15-year-olds (p = .009 and p = .012, respectively). However, some 20-year-old subjects remained greatly dissatisfied with aspects of their facial appearance. Subjects with visible anomalies were significantly more dissatisfied with their appearance than subjects with invisible anomalies (p = .035). The 15-year-old subjects were identified as being significantly more dissatisfied with appearance than their parents (p = .005).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects affected by a cleft with visible impairments are more dissatisfied with their facial appearance than are subjects with invisible impairments. Satisfaction with facial appearance among 10- and 15-year-old subjects with a cleft may be associated with their self-reported levels of psychosocial functioning. Measuring self-satisfaction with appearance may help to identify subjects at risk from adjustment problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9167073     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0226_swfaas_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  24 in total

1.  Permanent maxillary central incisor and first molar rotations in the mixed dentition in repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and their relationship with absence of teeth in their vicinity.

Authors:  Sunjay Suri; Suteeta Disthaporn; Bruce Ross; Bryan Tompson; Diogenes Baena; David Fisher; Wendy Lou
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Long-term effects of oral clefts on health care utilization: a sibling comparison.

Authors:  Morten Saaby Pedersen; George L Wehby; Dorthe Almind Pedersen; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-06-08

3.  Patient satisfaction and quality of life after orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate deformity.

Authors:  Yi-Hsuan Chen; Yu-Fang Liao; Chun-Shin Chang; Ting-Chen Lu; Kuo-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Oral cleft recurrence risk and subsequent maternal fertility preferences and behavior in Brazil.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Kwame A Nyarko; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-12-31

5.  Health professionals' assessment of health-related quality of life values for oral clefting by age using a visual analogue scale method.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Robert L Ohsfeldt; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2006-07

6.  Interdisciplinary craniofacial teams compared with individual providers: is orofacial cleft care more comprehensive and do parents perceive better outcomes?

Authors:  April A Austin; Charlotte M Druschel; Margaret C Tyler; Paul A Romitti; Imara I West; Peter C Damiano; James M Robbins; Whitney Burnett
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-01

7.  Fetal health shocks and early inequalities in health capital accumulation.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Kwame A Nyarko; Jorge S Lopez-Camelo
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Does the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight vary by oral clefts? evidence using South American and United States samples.

Authors:  Kwame A Nyarko; Jorge Lopez-Camelo; Eduardo E Castilla; George L Wehby
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 9.  The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs.

Authors:  G L Wehby; C H Cassell
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.511

10.  An Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in a group of 4-7 year-old children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Darius Sagheri; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; Bert Braumann; Sylvia von Mackensen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.