Literature DB >> 9166949

Prognostic impact of proliferation-associated factors MIB1 (Ki-67) and S-phase in node-negative breast cancer.

P Dettmar1, N Harbeck, C Thomssen, L Pache, P Ziffer, K Fizi, F Jänicke, W Nathrath, M Schmitt, H Graeff, H Höfler.   

Abstract

MIB1 proliferation rate (MIB1-PR) and total S-phase fraction (SPF) were retrospectively determined in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of 90 primary node-negative breast carcinomas. None of the patients had received adjuvant systemic therapy. Median follow-up in patients still alive at the time of analysis was 37.5 months (16-72 months). Immunostaining of Ki-67 antigen was performed using the monoclonal antibody MIB1 and the APAAP technique. An adjacent 50-microm paraffin section was used for flow cytometric S-phase determination. Results were compared to established clinicopathological prognostic factors. MIB1-PR was significantly correlated to grading (P = 0.018); SPF was significantly correlated with tumour size (P = 0.041) and inversely with steroid hormone receptor status (P = 0.03). A significant correlation between MIB1-PR and SPF was found in aneuploid (P = 0.025) but not in diploid tumours (P = 0.164). In univariate analysis, both MIB1-PR (optimized cut-off of 25%) and SPF (optimized cut-off of 8%) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) (MIB1-PR, P = 0.0224; SPF, P = 0.0028). In multivariate analysis, however, only SPF remained significant; it was the strongest prognostic factor for DFS (P = 0.0073), stronger than MIB1-PR or established clinicopathological prognostic factors. We thus conclude that MIB1-PR and SPF provide additional prognostic information in node-negative breast cancer. However, in our study, flow cytometrically determined SPF had the greater prognostic impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9166949      PMCID: PMC2223494          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  38 in total

1.  DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens.

Authors:  L G Dressler; L C Seamer; M A Owens; G M Clark; W L McGuire
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Cancer of the breast: size of neoplasm and prognosis.

Authors:  B Fisher; N H Slack; I D Bross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67.

Authors:  J Gerdes; H Lemke; H Baisch; H H Wacker; U Schwab; H Stein
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes).

Authors:  J L Cordell; B Falini; W N Erber; A K Ghosh; Z Abdulaziz; S MacDonald; K A Pulford; H Stein; D Y Mason
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation.

Authors:  J Gerdes; U Schwab; H Lemke; H Stein
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Association of DNA index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of nodes positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  D W Hedley; C A Rugg; R D Gelber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the study of aneuploidy and its clinical significance.

Authors:  D W Hedley; M L Friedlander; I W Taylor
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1985-07

8.  Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry.

Authors:  D W Hedley; M L Friedlander; I W Taylor; C A Rugg; E A Musgrove
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Aneuploid DNA content and high S-phase fraction of tumour cells are related to poor prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  O P Kallioniemi; T Hietanen; J Mattila; M Lehtinen; K Lauslahti; T Koivula
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-03

10.  The correlation of growth fractions with histologic grading and lymph node status in human mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  R J Lellé; W Heidenreich; G Stauch; J Gerdes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Proliferation markers in tumours: interpretation and clinical value.

Authors:  P J van Diest; G Brugal; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Role of the Cdc25A phosphatase in human breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Cangi; B Cukor; P Soung; S Signoretti; G Moreira; M Ranashinge; B Cady; M Pagano; M Loda
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Prognostic comparative study of S-phase fraction and Ki-67 index in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A E Pinto; S André; T Pereira; S Nóbrega; J Soares
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer.

Authors:  F Barzanti; M Dal Susino; A Volpi; D Amadori; A Riccobon; E Scarpi; L Medri; L Bernardi; S Naldi; M Aldi; M Gaudio; W Zoli
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Dejan Maglic; Fumitake Kai; Sinan Zhu; Robert D Kendig; Elizabeth A Fry; Kazushi Inoue
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20

Review 7.  Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  P J van Diest; E van der Wall; J P A Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Biological characterisation of breast cancer by means of PET.

Authors:  Andreas K Buck; Holger Schirrmeister; Torsten Mattfeldt; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Serum sFas and tumor tissue FasL negatively correlated with survival in Egyptian patients suffering from breast ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashgan I El-Sarha; Gehan M Magour; Sameh M Zaki; Mohamed Y El-Sammak
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Prognostic value of proliferation markers: immunohistochemical ki-67 expression and cytometric s-phase fraction of women with breast cancer in libya.

Authors:  Eramah Ermiah; Abdelbaset Buhmeida; Fathi Abdalla; Ben Romdhane Khaled; Nada Salem; Seppo Pyrhönen; Yrjö Collan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.